No variance between the allegation in a pleading and the proof is to be deemed material, unless it has actually misled the adverse party to his prejudice in maintaining his action or defense upon the merits. Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of ... - Page 20by Oregon. Supreme Court, William Wallace Thayer, Joseph Gardner Wilson, Thomas Benton Odeneal, Julius Augustus Stratton, William Henry Holmes, Frank A. Turner, Reuben S. Strahan, George Henry Burnett, Robert Graves Morrow, James W. Crawford, Bellinger, Charles Byron - 1915Full view - About this book
| Daniel Kimball Whitaker, Milton Clapp, William Gilmore Simms, James Henley Thornwell - 1850 - 570 pages
...variance between the allegation in a pleading, and the proof is to be deemed material, unless it have actually misled the adverse party to his prejudice in maintaining his action or defence upon the merits. In case of a failure of proof, and a verdict of the jury, or finding of the... | |
| 1848 - 718 pages
...between the allegation in a pleading and the proof, shall be deemed material, unless it have oclnally misled the adverse party to his prejudice, in maintaining his action or defence upon the merits. Where the variance is immaterial, the court may direct the fact to be found... | |
| New York (State). - 1850 - 920 pages
...variance between the allegation in a pleading and the proof, is to be deemed material, unless it have actually misled the adverse party, to his prejudice, in maintaining his action or defence, uj on the merits. Whenever it is alleged, that a party has been so misled, that fact must... | |
| Tennessee. Supreme Court, West Hughes Humphreys - 1850 - 862 pages
...variance between an allegation in a pleading, and the proof shall be deemed material, unless it shall hare misled the adverse party to his prejudice in maintaining his action or defence upon the merits. Whenever it shall be alleged that a party has been so misled, and that fact... | |
| Kentucky - 1851 - 548 pages
...pleading, and amendments. § 182. No variance between the allegation in a pleading and the proof, is to be deemed material, unless it has actually misled the...his prejudice, in maintaining his action or defense upon the merits. Whenever it is alledged that a party has been so misled, that fact must be shown to... | |
| Kentucky - 1851 - 544 pages
...pleading, and amendments. § 182. No variance between the allegation in a pleading and the proof, is to be deemed material, unless it has actually misled the...his prejudice, in maintaining his action or defense upon the merits. Whenever it is alledged that a party has been so misled, that fact must be shown to... | |
| New York (State). - 1851 - 266 pages
...the allegation in a pleading Material and the proof, shall be deemed material, unless it haveK"p%J;. actually misled the adverse party, to his prejudice, in maintaining his action or defence, upon the merits. Whenever it shall be alleged, that a party has been so misled, that fact... | |
| 1851 - 518 pages
...variance between the allegation in a pleading and the proof, shall be deemed material, unless it have actually misled the adverse party, to his prejudice, in maintaining his action or defence, upon the merits. Whenever it shall be alleged that a party has been so misled, that fact shall... | |
| New York (State), Member of the New-York Bar - 1851 - 410 pages
...variance between the allegation in a pleading and the proof, shall be deemed material, unless it have actually misled the adverse party, to his prejudice, in maintaining his action or defence, upon the merits. Whenever it shall be alleged, that • One of the wisest and most beneficent... | |
| New York (State) - 1851 - 1408 pages
...allegation in a pleadingMoicrial and the proof, shall be deemed material, unless it have h™"™";. actually misled the adverse party, to his prejudice, in maintaining his action or defence,upon therncrits. Whenever it shall be alleged, that a party has been so misled, that fact shall... | |
| |