Page images
PDF
EPUB

CANONS.

From Nature.

To the south of Salt Lake and the Mormon Territory lies a dreary series of plateaux traversed by the Colorado river and its tributaries, which bear their burthen of waters into the Gulf of California. Though this region possesses many considerable streams, it is over large areas a kind of desolate wilderness, for instead of irrigating the ground these streams flow in profound gorges, which serve as natural drains to carry off the water which may fall upon the tablelands. Many fabulous tales have been told of these regions, their natural marvels receiving many amplifications as they came to be rehearsed by Indians, trappers, and adventurous wanderers into the far west. In 1857 the Government of the United States despatched an expedition to explore that little known portion of the Continent, and the report published by the expedition in 1861 gave the first trustworthy and detailed account of the Colorado region. The truth turned out to be almost stranger than the fiction. A vast territory was found to be intersected by ravines leading into the main line of gorges of the Colorado. These ravines, or cañons as they are termed, meander over the table-land as rivers do over alluvial meadows; but they are thousands of feet deep-hundreds of miles long, and so numerous that the country traversed by them is said to be impassable, save to the fowls of the air.

The longest and deepest gorge is the Grand Cañon of the Colorado. Its length was set down by Dr. Newberry as about 300 miles; and its walls were described as rising steeply, sometimes vertically, from the margin of the river which filled the bottom of the ravine, to a height of from 3,000 to 6,000 feet a line of precipice or natural section which has not yet found its equal on any other part of the globe. Attention has lately been again called to this remarkable gorge by the interesting narrative in Mr. Bell's New Tracks in North America," and by the fuller details, as yet only partially published, obtained by an exploring party under Colonel Powell, of the United States army. By successive travellers and Government expeditions the gorges of the Colorado had been reached here and there. The surveying party of 1857-58 mapped them out and gave many admirable drawings of them, but declared the river not to be navigable above the Black Cañon. Profiting by previous failures, and by all the information which he could receive from Indians and others, Colonel Powell conceived the bold idea of attempting the de

scent of the Colorado in boats. After months of toil and danger, he succeeded in forcing the passage of these forbidding gorges, and emerging safely at their further end. From his survey it appears that the Grand Cañon is 238 miles long, and from 2,500 to 4,000 feet deep. But though this is the longest, there are other ravines of hardly inferior dimensions. On the Green River, Col. Powell's party navigated a series 190 miles long. From where the Green River joins the Colorado, they passed through a succession of cañons for a distance of 256 miles before they came to the Grand Cañon.

Each cañon has tributary cañons: these again have often also their tributaries. In some places the lateral gorges crowd so closely together where they join the main one, that they are divided by perpendicular walls of rock, which seem so narrow at top as hardly to furnish footing for a man, though in reality large enough to support cathedrals. And these walls shoot 2,000 or 3,000 feet above the river, "while rocks and crags and peaks rise still higher, away back from the river, until they reach an altitude of nearly 5,000 feet." They consist to a large extent of brown, grey, and orange-coloured sandstones, gently inclined or horizontal, beneath which marble and granite in some places have been deeply trenched. In some places the walls are so absolutely vertical, that it is impossible to find a pathway between their base and the water. But where, owing to rapids, some portage was necessary, the explorers usually succeeded in carrying their stores, and sometimes even their boats, along the base of the cliffs.

The water of the Colorado River is red and muddy. It receives some tributary streams of clear water, but others are very turbid, particularly one which the expedi tion appropriately marked as the Dirty Devil. Moreover, after every heavy shower of rain, "cascades of red mud pour over the walls from the red sandstone above, with a fall of hundreds of feet." We await with interest the detailed report which Colonel Powell will furnish of these features of the river.

Dr. Newberry, who described this territory in the report of the former Exploring Expedition above referred to, declared his opinion that, notwithstanding the stupendous scale on which these cañons or ravines had been formed, they were all nevertheless true river-gorges, excavated by the erosive action of running water. Some geologists, as Dr. Foster of Chicago, in his recent work on the Mississippi Valley, have opposed

this opinion, and have suggested that "the form and outline of these chasms were first determined by plutonic agency." But Dr. Newberry's explanation has been very generally accepted. He showed that there is nowhere any trace of fracture or disturbance, and that when the Cañon is dry its rocky bottom shows no mark of dislocation. Indeed, when we consider the intricate ramifications of these cañons, so precisely similar to the ordinary outlines of a drainage system over a low flat ground, it seems impossible to conceive of any agency capable of producing such ravines save the streams which flow in them.

streams drawing their supplies of water from a distance, either from melted snow or abundant rainfall in the upper parts of their basins, must be maintained in sufficient volume to keep their channels full, either for the whole, or a good part of the year. 2nd. There must be a considerable uniformity in the character of the rock which the stream has first to cut through. It is not necessary that the rock should be soft, but it should preserve for a long distance, and present to the erosive action of the river, the same kind of geological texture and structure. Hence, horizontal or gently undulating strata, as of sandstone, or limestone, offer the greatest facilities for the erosion of cañons, as we know they do in our own country for the formation of

But if cañons are merely the results of ordinary river erosion, why do they not occur everywhere? To such a question we may reply that river-ravines do occur every-ordinary river-ravines. When once the where, but is is only where the special circumstances which favour the formation of such ravines are most fully developed that they grow into the depth and length of cañons. What then are these special circumstances?

If we watch what takes place along the course of the rivers of this country, we can mark two kinds of erosion distinctly at work. First there is the river, grinding down the sides and bottom of its channel by sweeping along sand and shingle; and, secondly, there is the action of rain, springs, and frosts perpetually loosening the sides of the water-course, and sending the débris into the river which sweeps it away. If the river were not interfered with by these other subaerial agents, it would in time dig out for itself a gorge with more or less precipitous sides. But in proportion as these agents come into play, the ravine-like character passes into that of a valley with sloping sides. Where river erosion predominates we have ravines, where it is modified by rains and springs, but especially by frosts, we have valleys. Many of our rivers run both through gorges and along valleys, the changes in the nature of their banks being determined by corresponding changes in the nature and grouping of the rocks of which these banks consist, and the greater or less facility with which the rocks have been worn away by the one form of denudation or the other. The conditions needful for the formation of cañons, therefore, appear at present to be chiefly these:-1st. The erosive power of the streams must be greatly in excess of that of the other forms of atmospheric denudation. The rainfall must be small, or, at least, so equally distributed over the year as to reduce pluvial action to a minimum. Frosts must be equally rare and unimportant. The main

river has excavated its channel so deep that it cannot quit it, the nature of the rock may vary indefinitely without materially altering the aspect of the cañon. Hence on the Colorado, while the upper and chief part of the cañon has been cut through flat sandstone, limestone, and other strata, the lower portion has been excavated in marble and even in granite. 3rd. The country must be sufficiently elevated above the sea, either originally or by subsequent upheaval, to permit of a considerable declivity in its river-channels. The slope must be sufficient, not merely to let the water run off, but to give rise to currents strong enough to sweep along sand and gravel, and to excavate pot-holes. It is by the ceaseless grinding of such detrital material along the bottom of the river that the ravine is slowly deepened. Geologists, although they have constantly recognized this action, have not, perhaps, been always fully aware of its rapidity and extent, partly, no doubt, from the want of reliable data as to the nature and amount of the detritus pushed by rivers along the bottom of their beds. Messrs. Humphreys and Abbot computed that the Mississippi annually pushes into the Gulf of Mexico 750,000,000 cubic feet of gravel and sand, “which would cover a square mile about twenty-seven feet deep." The writer of the present paper was surprised a few years ago to find that the Rhine, after escaping from all its ravines and entering the low country about Bonn, retained force enough to drive along shingle upon its bed. By laying the ear to the bottom of a boat floating down mid-channel, it was easy to hear the grating of the stones as they rolled over each other. Hence we see that a river, which may be perfectly navigable by steamers, may yet have rapidity enough to scour its bed with coarse shingle. The

scour will, of course, be greater in proportion to the narrowing of the breadth of the stream and the increase of the slope.

It is mainly this eroding action which, so far as we know at present, has carved out the cañons of the Colorado. These wonderful ravines, meandering as ordinary rivers do, have sunk inch by inch into the country, retaining their original curves and windings, though continually increasing in depth. Unassisted, or aided but feebly, by the other subaerial agents, which, in such a country as ours, tend to break down the walls of ravines; and undisturbed by the inequalities of surface so characteristic of regions that have been under the influence of glacier-ice, the rivers, probably once much fuller than now, have been allowed to dig out their gorges through the table-lands of the Colorado, and to convert a tract of country, originally, perhaps, green and well-watered, into a dreary desert, intersected by a network of profound impassable ravines. ARCH. GEIKIE.

The absence of any trace of glacial action on the Pacific slope is noted by Whitney (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sciences, California, iii. 272), and by Foster ("Missis

sippi Valley," p. 338).

From The Saturday Review. GOETHE'S CONVERSATIONS WITH CHANCELLOR VON MULLER.*

A NEW record of Goethe's conversation is a literary event indeed, and one of quite a different character from those interminable manipulations which the well-nigh exhausted ores of trivial correspondence and minute biographical detail are still undergoing in Germany. The expectations naturally excited among those who have learned from Eckermann to appreciate the special advantage of the vox viva over the litera scripta, if somewhat moderated upon the appearance of the work, have yet not been found wholly delusive. Chancellor von Müller's reminiscences cannot be described as an appendix to Eckermann's, since, commencing at an earlier period than the latter, they run parallel with them for the greater part of their course. Neither can they be considered in the light of a supplement, for no essential detail is supplied, and no important misrepresentation rectified. The book may rather be regarded as a replica of Eckermann's on a smaller scale, attended

* Goethe's Unterhaltungen mit dem Kanzler Fried. rich von Muller. Herausgegeben von C. A. H. Burkhardt. Stuttgart: Cotta. London: Williams & Norgate.

by the double advantage of confirming the authenticity and elucidating the distinctive traits of the original. As in the successful repetition of an experiment with the spectroscope, the lines reappear, but some are better defined. In some respects, to be noticed presently, it may serve as a corrective of errors arising from the too exclusive contemplation of Goethe under a particular aspect. In the main it is a welcome attestation of the justice of the accepted view, and a salutary admonition to disregard those who, impelled by vanity or the passion for paradox, will in time insist on presenting us with "an entirely new reading of the character." Goethe appeared to Von Müller as he appeared to Eckermann, as he appeared to Zelter, as he appears in his own writings, and more particularly in those portions of the second part of Faust in which he has embodied the maturest conclusions of his wisdom and the final results of his experience. Respecting the qualifications of Chancellor von Müller as a recorder of Goethe's conversation, it is not necessary to say much. His name is already a household word with all students of Goethe, and it is apparent that, while few enjoyed the poet's intimacy to a greater degree, none met him more nearly on a footing of equality, or felt more thoroughly in harmony with the peculiar attributes of his intellect. Any defects must be ascribed, not to a want of discernment in the reporter, but to errors of memory, omission to take notes, or that confusion of impressions which is so often the mortifying residuum of the most intellectual, and, while it lasted, most vividly enjoyed and clearly apprehended, talk.

We have intimated that Goethe may have been considered too exclusively in a particular point of view. It is, indeed, inevitable that the minor features of any character should to some extent be obscured by the more salient ones. Goethe's serenity and self-sufficiency are so imposing in themselves, and claim so large a share of any comprehensive survey of his character, that its elements of frailty and versatility are liable to be overlooked. No observer could have been more remote than Chancellor von Müller from the valet de chambre point of view, but his veneration does not tempt him to dissimulate his hero's occasional ill-humour and caprice. The references to Goethe's attacks of indisposition are also sufficiently numerous to surprise those who have pictured his old age as one of unbroken vigour and unimpaired health. In the main, no doubt, it was marvellously robust, but the interruptions of this desirable condition appear to have been frequent

[ocr errors]

and serious, and must have told upon a single pregnant phrase, Der Geist der stets mental constitution of such exquisite sen- verneint. sitiveness. That Goethe's susceptibility Goethe's remarks on the subject of relishould appear more distinctly here than in gion are numerous and striking. One of Eckermann is a natural result of the Chan- the last of his observations recorded is to cellor's superiority to the secretary in intel- the effect that mankind was passing through lectual independence and social position. a great religious crisis; How it will come Von Müller, in fact, distinctly calls Goethe out I cannot tell, but come out it must and a Proteus, and the epithet may be accepted will." On another occasion he explained if we bear in mind that his versatility mainly the rapid success of Christianity by its arose from his tendency to regard things having incorporated the truths of natural from an æsthetic point of view. Through- religion, and added that there was in fact out these and all his other discussions we no opposition between the two. He frefind him intent upon ascertaining some quently recurs to the question of immorinner law of propriety and harmony, to the tality. A memorable passage in Eckertest of which the subject under considera- mann is thus expanded and enforced : tion might be brought. Nothing repugnant Reinhard's present of Tibullus led to a very to this fine sense of artistic symmetry could serious conversation on the "Ecce jacet Tibulsatisfy him. His hostility to Newton's lus," and on the belief of a personal existence theory of colours is a remarkable instance after death. Goethe expressed himself deciof this. A minor but not less characteristic dedly. It was impossible for a thinking being example occurs here in a violent, and at to conceive a non-existence, a cessation of first sight inexplicable, tirade-inexpli- thought and life; thus far every one involuncable, that is, as coming from Goethe tarily carried the proof of immortality in himagainst mixed marriages between Christians self. But as soon as one quitted the ground of and Jews. Nothing can be easily imagined inner consciousness, as soon as, in the attempt more apparently inconsistent with the char- to demonstrate or comprehend, one stuffed this acter of the speaker. The motive, how-subjective perception out into an inept system ever, is soon revealed; the betrothal of a (philisterhaft ausstaffire), one became involved in contradictions. non-Christian with Christian rites in a Christian church shocks his intuition of artistic propriety, and considerations derived from abstract reason go for nothing in compari

son.

It is important in studying Goethe to remember that the poet is the kernel of the man, and that his science is but a phase of his poetry. Few observations in the collection are more characteristic than the remark

(made at the age of seventy) that he could still be moved to tears by the contemplation of singular moral or artistic excellence, but no more by compassion for others or by his own misfortunes. In the same spirit he refused even to look at a set of caricatures of Napoleon.

The following sayings are intensely Goe

thean:

[blocks in formation]

On another occasion he said:

I must confess that I should not know what to

do with immortality if it offered me no new problems to solve and difficulties to surmount. But there is no fear of that; one need only to look up into the starry heavens to see that there will be nuts enough to crack.

Lucretius has attracted much attention of

late. Goethe's opinion of him as a thinker will be found interesting:

Lucretius's religious opinions need not be considered; his conception of nature is gorgeous, ingenious, sublime, and altogether praiseworthy; his views of the ultimate ground of things are of no importance. Men were haunted in his day by a terrible fear of the state after death, something like the purgatory of bigoted Cathoother extreme, and wanted to make an end of lics. Enraged at this, Lucretius fell into the their fears once for all by his doctrine of annihilation. Throughout the whole poem we perceive a gloomy, indignant spirit, disdainful of the inbeen so, as with Spinoza and other heretics. If tellectual poverty of the age. It has always men would not be contemptible, philosophers need not be absurd. The abstruse paradoxes of Lucretius always remind me of Frederick the Great, when at the battle of Kollin he exclaimed to his grenadiers who hesitated to attack a battery, "Dogs, would ye live for ever?"

Fewer utterances on science are here recorded than might have been anticipated,

[ocr errors]

considering Goethe's ever-increasing devo-mitting the fascination of metaphysics, and tion to the study of nature during the latter deploring the time which he had been led, years of his life. We know from Ecker- at a very advanced age, to devote to the mann how frequently science formed the study of Hegel. In a very remarkable contopic of his conversation; its want of versation (1823) he expressly ascribes prominence in Von Müller's records is the progress of scientific discovery to probably due to the Chancellor's compara- the impulse communicated by philosophy. tive inattention to the subject. The follow-" ing notes are, however, very interesting, and their interest is enhanced by the circumstance of the conversation being the last recorded. It took place on February 26th, 1832, one month and two days before the death of Goethe. being informed that his interlocutors were He observed, on endeavouring to master his Theory of Col

ours:

The matter is very simple, but difficult on that very account. The greatest truths are oftennay almost always-contradictory to the perceptions of sense. What can in appearance be more preposterous than the motion of the earth

around the sun?

Nature delights in the infinite variation of the individual phenomenon, but we must not suffer ourselves to be distracted by her. We must as certain the one invariable rule on which all her seeming variety depends.

ers.

The great comet is coming in 1834. I have already written to Schrön in Jena to compile a collection of all the notices we have of him, that so distinguished a gentleman may not fail of a becoming reception.

and set in a new light, and it was a joy to Everything was wonderfully re-fashioned see in how far more worthy a manner every branch of science was pursued. This was the service rendered by philosophy, which, in spite of the host of absurd systems, had energy." penetrated everything with new vivifying

Literary anecdotes and criticisms are as Space will only allow us to cite some of frequent as would naturally be anticipated. authors. He appears to have been familGoethe's remarks on English contemporary iarly acquainted with only two of these, Scott and Byron. Notwithstanding the akin to his own genius than the moody selfhealthy objectivity of Scott, so much more anatomy of Byron, we find him according a decided preference to the latter. His opinion of Scott seems indeed unduly depreciaIt is well for you who can go into gardens siastic praise which, in his conversation with and woods and look innocently on trees and flow-Eckermann, he bestows on one of the latest tory, and hard to reconcile with the enthuAll I see there reminds me of the meta- and weakest of the Waverley novels. It morphosis of plants, and torments me with speculation upon it. characteristically Scotch colouring of the must be remembered, nevertheless, that the them at a great disadvantage with even the earlier members of the series would place most intelligent foreign critics. occasion Goethe renders full justice to On one and apologizes in a manner for the limited Scott's greatness as an historical novelist, range of his own fictions by dwelling on the want of national spirit in Germany, and the tion is unjust, and he must have forgotten poverty of German history. The accusahis own Egmont and Götz von Berlichingen. His judgments on Byron are somewhat fluctuating. jectured that the object of his admiration was less Byron the poet than Byron the It may be reasonably conproblematic nature -a character of that class which, as he elsewhere says when speaking of Bettina, afforded him endless interest. He also regarded Byron as the fresh organic type-in which capacity he representative of a new order of mind - a is introduced as Euphorion into the second part of Faust. The most important specific criticism is on Heaven and Earth, which Goethe, in our opinion rightly, prefers to Cain; in another place, however, he speaks with just admiration of the magnificent imprecation pronounced by Eve in the latter drama. An astounding encomium on the

The great controversy of development versus fixity of type, in which Goethe took so intense an interest, is only once referred to,.but the passage is full of significance:

Geoffroy de Saint Hilaire, with his one original
type of all organizations, and his Système
d'Analogies, is quite in the right against Cuvier,
who is after all only a prosy fellow (Philister),
I chanced long ago upon that simple original
type. No organic being entirely corresponds to

the idea at the root of it; behind each is con-
cealed the higher idea: there is my God! there
is the God whom we all everlastingly seek and
hope to contemplate in His fulness (erschauen);
but we can only divine, never behold Him!

The exalted feeling of this passage will sug-
gest how little sympathy Goethe, notwith-
standing the practical element in his nature,
could have entertained for some of the
schools of thought most fashionable in our
day. Positivism and physiological mate-
rialism would evidently have been about
equally uncongenial to him. In spite of his
strong perception of reality we find him ad-

66

[ocr errors]
« PreviousContinue »