American Puritan Imagination: Essays in Revaluation

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, 1974 M06 28 - 265 pages
Over the last two decades a major revaluation has been taking place of the colonial Puritan imagination. With the growth of interest in early American literature has come increasing recognition of its quality and a better understanding of its place in the continuity of American culture. However, much of the best critical work to date has been published as articles in scholarly journals, and in bringing together for the first time the best work in this growing field the present anthology fills a number of important needs. It is at once a valuabale and accessible introduction for students, a summing-up of a new enterprise, and a guide for further studies.
 

Contents

Sacvan Bercovitch page I
17
Literary consequences of Puritanism
34
The Puritan jeremiad as a literary form
45
Spiritual biography and the Lords Remembrancers
56
William Bradfords
77
The Puritan poetry of Anne Bradstreet
107
The example of Edward Taylor
123
Cotton
139
Benjamin Franklin and the choice of a single point
173
Sacvan Bercovitch
239
Index
259
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (1974)

Sacvan Bercovitch, who is a professor at Harvard University, is probably the most influential critic in American studies today. Tracing the function of rhetoric in American writing from the Puritans through the nineteenth century, Bercovitch has argued that the persuasiveness of rhetoric is in proportion to its capacity to help people act in history. In his books, Bercovitch has revealed the power of American rhetoric as it creates a myth of America that conflates religious and political issues, transforming even the most despairing and critical energies into affirmations of the American way. Among his major arguments is the idea that the rhetoric of America's colonial sermons and histories, founding documents, such as the Declaration of Independence, and novels of the American Renaissance, all participate in the project of transforming what he calls dissensus into rituals of consensus.

Bibliographic information