Equity and the Constitution: The Supreme Court, Equitable Relief, and Public PolicySince the landmark desegregation decisions in the Brown vs. Board of Education cases, the proper role of the federal judiciary has been hotly debated. Has the federal judiciary, in its attempt to legislate social policy, overstepped its constitutional boundaries? In this volume, Gary McDowell considers the equity power created by Article III of the Constitution, on which the most controversial decisions of the Supreme Court have rested. He points out the equity was originally understood as an extraordinary means of offering relief to individuals in cases of fraud, accident, mistake, or trust and as a means of "confining the operation of unjust and partial laws." It has now been stretched to offer relief to broadly defined social classes. This "sociological" understanding, in McDowell's view, has undermined equity as a substantive body of law. He urges a return to the former definition as a means of restraining the reach of federal jurisdiction. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
action administration adoption American attempt authority began Board of Education Brown Chancery Chief Justice Civil claims clear Codification Commentaries common law concern Congress considered Constitution continued County courts of equity dangerous decrees demands denied discretion distinction district doctrine effect England English equal equity jurisprudence established exercise expressed federal courts Federalist Field follow fundamental further give History human Ibid idea Institutes intention interest James Jefferson John judges judgment judicial judicial power judiciary jurisdiction justice law and equity legislative legislature letter limited Madison matter means Movement nature necessary never notion opinion original particular pleadings political positive practice precedent presented principles procedure proceedings question racial reason relief remedy republican result rules sense separate social statute Story suit Supreme Court thought tion tradition understanding United University Press Writings written York