 | Michigan. Constitutional Convention - 1850 - 990 pages
...final passage of all bills the vote shall be by ayes and nays, and entered on the journal. Sec. 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
 | Michigan - 1850 - 40 pages
...the final passage of all bills the vote shall be by ayes and nays, and entered on the journal § 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
 | Virginia - 1851 - 1348 pages
...his religious instructor, aud to make for his support such private contract as. be shall please. 16. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in it* title ; nor shall any law be revived or amended by reference to its title, but the act revived... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1907 - 792 pages
...unconstitutional, in that it violates section 20 of article 4 of the Constitution, which provides that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. It is established by our decisions that, if what is introduced by way of an amendment to an act might... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1892 - 830 pages
...attacked for the following reasons: 1. That it is contrary to article 4, § 20, of the Constitution, which says: " No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." 2. That it confers upon military officers the power of arbitrarily setting aside the authority of the... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1891 - 776 pages
...the constitutional provision as claimed by defendant's counsel. This constitutional provision is — "No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." This provision requires that the title shall fairly indicate the general object of the law. Mr. Cooley,... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1887 - 736 pages
...Robinson v. McAfee Ettate, 375. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. 1. The purpose of the constitutional provision that " no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title " [sec. 20, Art. 4] was to prevent "the practice of bringing together mto one bill subjects diverse... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1910 - 804 pages
...intoxicating liquors is not in violation of the Constitution of 1850, art. 4, £ 20, providing that no law shall embrace more than one object which shall be expressed in its title, in that it provides a civil remedy for the violation of the statute. 2 Comp. Laws, §§ 6379-6446.... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1897 - 824 pages
...The first objection is that it is repugnant to section 20, art. 4, of the Constitution, which reads, "No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." The objection is not sound. The title is sufficiently comprehensive. The one general object, which... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1900 - 804 pages
...therefore in conflict with section 20 of article 4 of the Constitution of this State, which provides that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. " We think this contention sufficiently answered by what was said by this court in Soukup v. Van Dyke,... | |
| |
No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title... 
