Page images
PDF
EPUB

VOL. 74. MICHIGAN REPORTS.

Cited in the following series:

U. S. Supreme Court (US; LEd, Lawyers' Edition); Federal Reports (Fed); Wisconsin (Wis); Massachusetts (Mas); Illinois (Ill); New Jersey Equity (NJE); New Jersey Law (NJL); New York (NY); and the Lawyers' Reports, Annotated (LRA) and its Annotation (n).

Shows where the decisions in this volume have been cited-where to find precedents on their subjects from the courts carrying most weight in this state. The ANNOTATIONS referred to (marked n) give a complete presentation of authorities on the point in question-all the law.

N. B. Cut out and stick each block on page at its head, or citations for entire volume on inside front cover.

[blocks in formation]

CASES DECIDED

IN THE

SUPREME COURT

OF

MICHIGAN

FROM

FEBRUARY 8, 1889, TO JUNE 7, 1889.

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Copyright, 1890, for the State of Michigan, by Gilbert R. Osmun, Secretary of State.

Rec. Sapt. 12, 187

SUPREME COURT RULE 61.

As amended July 2, 1890.

RULE 61. "The party bringing a case into this Court shall, in his brief, make a clear and concise statement of the case, and of the errors upon which he relies. The Court will consider such statement sufficient and accurate, unless the opposing party shall point out in his brief wherein the statement is insufficient or inaccurate. And the party bringing a case into this Court shall print in his record, or in his brief, a complete index of the names of the witnesses whose testimony appears in such record, and the pages whereon the examination, cross, or re-examination is found; also the pages whereon any exhibit appears, and in cases at law the page of the record where any exceptions relied on may be found."

SUPREME COURT RULE 63.

Adopted July 2, 1890.

RULE 63. "In proceedings for mandamus, where an order to show cause has been made, the respondent must answer fully every material allegation of the petition; and every material averment not so answered may be taken admitted by the respondent to be true, as alleged. And in case no answer is made and filed as required by such order, the Court, upon due proof of service of the order, will award a peremptory mandamus as prayed for, or enforce obedience to the order by process for contempt."

« PreviousContinue »