Hughes v Hughes, 444
Hunter v Vanstone, 366
Hunter v Wilcockson, 424, 444

Inglehart v Gagnier, 75
Ingram v Taylor, 166
Intercolonial Bridge Co, v Southern
Railway, 329

International Bridge Co. v. Canada
Southern Ry., 144

James v. Balfour, 366

Jellett v Anderson, 303

TABLE OF CANADIAN CASES.

Murton v Kingston and Montreal
Forwarding Co., 278.

Muskoka Election Petition 304
Mutton v Dey 365.

Queen v C. A. Robertson, 220
Queen v Doutre, 218
Queen v Frawley, 275

Queen ex rel. Grant v Coleman, 385

McCall y Canada Farmers' Mutual Queen v Hodge, 275

Ins. Co.. 217.

McCallum v Odette, 272.
McCardle v Moore, 423.
McCausland v McCallum. 344.
McClive et al solicitors, In re, 98.
McClung v McCracken, 443-
McCrae v White, 146, 426.
McDonald v Field, 180.

Jessup v Grand Trunk Railway. 143 McDonald v Oliver, 369.

McDonald v Lane, et al, 239.
McDougall v Campbell, 92.
McDowall v Phippen, 143.
McGee v Campbell, 280.

McLaren v Canada Central Rail

way Co., 141.

McLean et al v the Queen, 271.
McLean v Pinkerton, 367.

Re McLellan v McKinnon, 277.

Lee v Credit Valley Ry. Co., 100
Leighton v Medley, 277
Lightbound v Hill, 74, 98
Lindsay v Morrison, Re, 444
London and Canadian Loan Co. v
Merritt et al, 279
Longhi v Sanson, 10
Love, Re, 371

Lowson v Canada Farmers Mutual

Ins. Co., 43. 55

Lucas v Ross, 371

McPherson v The Queen, 93.

Queen v McFarlane et al, 219
Queen v McNally, and Wm. Mc-
Nally, Claimant, 93

Queen v O'Rourke, 239

Rees v McKeown, 365.
Regina v Bennett, 401.
Regina v Chute, 139.
Regina v Cluff, 120
Regina v Grainger, 10.

Regina v Richardson, 10.

Regina v Smith, 10.

Regina ex rel. Watt v Lang and
Chadwick, 42.

Reid et al v Ramsay 138.
Reid v Smith, 205.

Reid v Wilson, 58.

Ricker v Ricker, 274.
Roberts v Hall, 177, 328.

McSorley v Mayor of St. John and Robinson v Hall, 277.

Napier v Hughes, 76

National In. Co. v Egleson, 11, 121
Neill v Travellers Ins. Co., 385
Neill v Union Mutual Ins. Co., 145
Nelles v Bank of Montreal, 385
Nelles v Second Mut. Ins. Co., II.
Nixon v Maltby, 276

Noble v Corporation of Toronto,
95

Norris v Meadows, 165

North of Scotland Mortgage Co. v

Udell, 94

Norvall v Canada Southern Ry.
Co, 98, 243, 281

Rosenburger v Grand Trunk Ry.
Company, 278.

Rosenstadt v Rosenstadt, 426.
Ross v Hunter, 162.
Ross, In re, II.

Rumohr v Marx, 55 444,

Russell, an Insolvent, In r‹, 384. Russell v The Canada Life Assurance Co., 142.

Russell Election, In re, 400.

Sackville v Pacey, 14.
Sanders v Malsberg, 206.
Sanders, In re the Township and
Town of, 368.

Saylor v Cooper, 262.
Scott v Creighton, 371.

Segsworth v Meriden Silver Plating
Co,, 440.

Shepherdson v McCullough, 140.
Seivewright v Leys, 76, 262.
Slater v Mosgrove, 12.
Smith v Doyle, 142.
Smith v Goldie, 276.
Smith v Raleigh, 346.

Snarr v Granite Curling and Skat-
ing Co,, 96.

Solicitors, In re, 55.
Sproule v Stratford, 179.
Squier, Re, 74.

St. Catharines and Lincoln, Re 11.
Steers v Shaw, 139.

Stewart, In re, Appeal from the
Court of Revision, 322.

Parry Sound Lumber Co. v Ferris Stewart v Rounds, 365.

Morrison v Taylor, 74.

Munsie v Lindsay, 207.

Pierce v Canavan, 165

Murray v Gillett, et al, 78.

Plumb v Steinhoff, 344

Swaisland v Davidson, 370.

Thurlow v Beck, 403.

Thurlow v Sidney, 278.

TABLE OF CASES

REPORTED AND NOTED IN THIS VOLUME IN "RECENT ENGLISH DECISIONS "

AND "RECENT ENGLISH PRACTICE CASES."

South Eastern Ry. Co. v Thomp- Wilkinson v Hull Ry. Co., 381