Yes, I remember when the dreariest waste,- Yes, I remember well, (e'en though with groans Or of that deeper which the heart doth wring, With Thee communion, thus thy works to feel? When Thou thy natural wonders dost reveal? To gain a 'vantage post in Fortune's wheel? Which always doth imply from art a scornful turning? I? Though I grant, as wiser men have said, The doctrine, that each project which can be Yet have they ended more in vanity, Than the most doting visions of the crazed, Or all the structures by fanatics raised. Now had I rather mope where Penury In rags, filth, smoke, and sickness, is emblazed, Screams in the ballad's rude discordancy, The howl of curs, coarse oaths, and the scold's ribaldry,- Where mountains, forests, rocks, lakes, streams, combine Is this, oh God, to shew the nothingness Thus, when I thought to drink, I drank but in a dream.' Extended as this article is, we must leave our task but halfperformed. We have scarcely touched upon the contents of the more recent volume, and can now only briefly advert to them. The "Desultory Thoughts in London" are divided into three books, comprising altogether upwards of four hundred stanzas of the difficult construction borrowed from the Italians, which has of late become so fashionable with our versifiers. Though not unsusceptible of dignity and sweetness, it is best adapted to the humorous, or, at least, the sportive, its distinguishing fea ture being lightness, while it seems to be considered as admitting of a license bordering on the Hudibrastic. Nothing can be more free, and various, and negligent than Mr. Lloyd's versification : it is sometimes gracefully playful, but sometimes too, its play is scarcely suitable to the solemn or pathetic cast of the sentiment, while at other times it sinks quite below the level of serious poetry. The thoughts are so very desultory that it would be difficult to frame an argument of the poem. The Author has not ventured to expose to view the heterogeneous contents in a bill of fare, aware, perhaps, that common readers would anticipate little gratification from such subjects as the following: A walk in the park; Methodist chapel; a portrait; consecration of Solomon's temple; influence of imagination; unfortunate females; election and reprobation; faith; free-will; the second advent," &c. Such are the running titles of the first sixty pages of the volume; and very injudiciously are they' so printed, as they will excite in the minds of nine persons out of ten, only ridiculous' ideas, which will prejudice then, unwarrantably, but perhaps effectually, against the volume. The chief fault of the poem is,' that it wants relief: the didactic is not, at least in the first two' books, sufficiently intermixed with the picturesque. The charm of "The Task" is, that it takes us out in the open air. Cowper is, indeed, the most delightful of field-preachers; and his descriptions always predispose the reader to receive the sentiments which seem to rise out of them. Lord Byron pleases by' the same method; but his philosophy is more dramatic, and his very sentiments are picturesque. If Mr. Lloyd had, as he well might have done, thrown into the first part of the poem more of the recollected scenes of his early life, (such as that near the Lake of Winandermere, which he describes in the third book,) he would have rendered it much more attractive. And the motto prefixed to the first book, excites the expectation that he would do so: Si je veux peindre le printemps, il faut que je sois en די hyver; si je veux decrire un beau paysage, il faut que je sois dans les murs.' On what, therefore, should Thoughts in • London' so naturally dwell, as on solitude, and nature, and the spring? One remark more. Mr. Lloyd apologises for having expressed himself unadvisedly on the doctrine of Election and the subject of moral evil: he wishes that he had not so expressed him self as he has done in the passage alluded to.' This frank retractation must disarm his critic of all disposition to severity; but we still regret the appearance of the passage, and wish that Mr. L. had kept clear of polemics. On these awful and inscrutable topics, feeling is a very unsafe guide, although to feel rightly,' is indispensable as a pre-requisite for thinking wisely:' the first crude conclusious which even an honest and acute mind may come to in pursuing such investigations, are not fit to be promulgated in poetry. We earnestly recommend that the greater part of pp. 49-62, should be cancelled in a future edition. The following remark does credit to the Author's acuteness, which invariably shines out in his prose. -The Author feels that he is wrong. Remorse, as distinct from regret, is a passion inalienable from human nature; and this passion tells us, by its awful voice, that it is for sin that we are tormented; and though the reasoning of necessity may make us anticipate that we never should feel remorse, yet, if we do feel remorse, hypothesis there is contradicted by fact, and the whole falls to the ground.' p. vii. Titus and Gisippus is a very interesting tale, founded on a hint borrowed from a story in Boccaccio, but original in its details, and enriched with that ample store of metaphysical sentiment in which Mr. Lloyd resembles and rivals our elder poets. This poem would sufficiently attest the undiminished vigour of the Author's faculties. There are detached passages, however, in the Desultory Thoughts, quite equal to any thing in either of the volumes: we may refer, in proof of this assertion, to the conclusion of the first book, and the description of the lake scene, with the pathetic address to his children, which occupies nearly the whole of the third. As we have charged Mr. Lloyd with being deficient as a colourist in language, we must, in justice, lay before our readers a specimen of what he can, when he pleases, achieve as a landscape-painter. Nothing can be more perfectly beautiful than the following romantic description. To a reader of any poetical feeling, it will render all further commendation of the volume superfluous. I had a cottage in a Paradise! 'Twere hard to enumerate the charms combin'd Within the little space, greeting the eyes, Its unpretending precincts that confin'd. Onward, in front, a mountain stream did rise When winter torrents by the rain and snow, That towards us with a rapid course it sped, In summer, winter, autumn, or the spring; The listener's feelings from their viewless spell. • When fires gleam'd bright, and when the curtain'd room, Well stocked with books and music's implements, When children's faces, dress'd in all the bloom Of innocent enjoyments, deep content's Deepest delights inspir'd; when nature's gloom To the domesticated heart presents (By consummate tranquillity possessed) Contrast, that might have stirr'd the dullest breast; The breeze that bore it; fearful as the groans Thy voice I've known to wake a dream of wonder ! Of audibility, one scarce could sunder Of harp Eolian, when upon the breeze • One might have thought, that spirits of the air And oft one might have thought, that shrieks were there But when the heavens are blue, and summer skies Such low, sweet tone, fit for the tune, does rise From thy swift course, methinks, that it enhances While each one's freshness seems to pay thee thanks.” Art. III. EYPITTIAOY ATTANTA. Euripidis Opera omnia; ex Editionibus præstantissimis fideliter recusa; Latina Interpretatione, Scholiis antiquis, et eruditorum Observationibus, illustrata; necnon Indicibus omnigenis instructa. 9 Vol. 8vo. 10l. 10s. Lond. [Priestley.] 1821. THE remains of the Greek theatre present to us the im paired but majestic fragments of one of the noblest structures of human genius. Its primary characters comprehend nearly all that the imagination can conceive of loftiness and power, mingled with a large measure of beauty and pathos. When Eschylus had presented to his audience the tremendous picture of Prometheus chained to the rock by the appalling agency of the symbolic messengers of vindictive Jove, he mitigated its terrors by the lovely forms and ministrant sympathiies of the ocean nymphs; and even amid the overwhelming horrors of the Eumenides, the bright vision of Apollo, and the persuasive mediation of Minerva, are introduced with exquisite skill and effect. If the niajestic simplicity of Sophocles, less daring in its inventions, and more equal in its range, did not indulge in contrasts so marked and impressive, yet, the power to blend the stern and fearful with the gentle and touching, was the decided prerogative of that illustrious dramatist. The miseries of the blind and fated dipus are alleviated by the devoted and self-renouncing tenderness of his daughters; the deep painting of the despair and agony of Ajax dishonoured, is relieved, and yet strengthened, by the affection of his wife, and the innocent helplessness of his child; nor is there one among the productions of this consummate inaster of his art, in which equally beautiful traits of unforced emotion |