 | William Pitt (Earl of Chatham), Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons - 1766 - 28 pages
...pven under arbitrary reigns, parliaments were aihamed .pf taxing a people without their confenr,• And allowed them reprefentatives. Why did the gentleman...Wales -, Wales, that never was taxed by parliament, 'till it was incorporated. I would not debate a particular point of law with the gentleman : I know... | |
 | Edmund Burke - 1780 - 700 pages
...confent, and allowed them reprefertatives. Why did the gentleman confine himfelf toChefterandDurham? He might have taken a higher example in Wales ; Wales, that never was taxed by parliament till it was incorporated. I would not debate a particular point of law with the gentleman : I know... | |
 | John Almon, William Pitt (Earl of Chatham) - 1792
...cited them, to have (hewn, that, even under any arbitrary reigns, parliaments were afliamed of taxing a people without their confent, and allowed them reprefentatives....Durham? He might have taken a higher example in Wales ; AVales that never was taxed by parliament, till it was incorporated. I would not debate a particular... | |
 | John Almon - 1793 - 542 pages
...them, to have fhewn that, ' even under any arbitrary reigns, Parlia' ments were amamed of taxing a people * without their confent, and allowed them '...Wales ; Wales that never was taxed by ' Parliament till it was incorporated. I ' would not debate a particular point of law 1 with the gentleman ; I know... | |
 | John Almon - 1797 - 550 pages
...them, to have fhewn that, . even under former arbitrary reigns, Parliaments were afhamed of taxing a people • without -their confent, and allowed them...himfelf to Chefter and Durham ; he might have taken an higher example in Wales ; Wales that never was taxed by Parliament till it was incorporated. I would... | |
 | Nathaniel Chapman - 1808 - 512 pages
...their consent ; and allowed them representatives. Why did the gentleman confine himself to Chester and Durham ? He might have taken a higher example in Wales; Wales that never was taxed by parliament till it was incorporated. I would not debate a particular point of law with the gentleman. I know his... | |
 | Nathaniel Chapman - 1808 - 518 pages
...their consent ; and allowed them representatives. Why did the gentleman confine himself to Chester and Durham? He might have taken a higher example in Wales ; Wales that never was taxed by parliament till it was incorporated. I would not debate a particular point of law with the gentleman. I know his... | |
 | William Hazlitt - 1809 - 608 pages
...without their consent, and allowed them representatives. Why did the gentleman confine himself to Chester and Durham ? He might have taken a higher example...Wales ; Wales, that never was taxed by parliament till it was incorporated. I would not debate a particular point of law with the gentleman : I know... | |
 | Elegant extracts - 1812 - 316 pages
...without their consent, and allowed them representatives. Why did the gentleman confine himself to Chester and Durham? He might have taken a higher example in Wales; Wales, that never was taxed by parliament till it was incorporated. I would not debate a particular point of law with the gentleman: I know his... | |
 | William Cobbett - 1813 - 726 pages
...without their consent, and allowed them representatives. Why did the gentleman confine himself to Chester and Durham ? He might have taken a higher example...Wales ; Wales, that never was taxed by parliament, till it was incorporated. I would not debate a particular point of law with the gentleman : I know... | |
| |
I would have cited them to show that, even under former arbitrary reigns, Parliaments were ashamed of taxing a people without their consent, and allowed them representatives. Why did the gentleman confine himself to Chester and Durham ? He might have... 
