That there is no right to secede. Of allegiance to the U. S. government. Public debt. Bonds issued under ordinance of Convention of 1868 and under acts of 1868, 1868-69, 186970 declared invalid. Exception. Exclusive emoluments, etc. safety and happiness; but every such right should be exercised in pursuance of the law, and consistently with the Constitution of the United States. Const. 1868; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 2. State v. Railway, 145-496; State v. Herring, 145-418; State v. Hicks, 143-689; State v. Lewis, 142-626; Durham v. Cotton Mills, 141-616; State v. Sutton, 139-574; State v. Holoman, 139-642; State v. Patterson, 134612; State v. Gallop, 126-979; Humphrey v. Church, 109-132; Winslow v. Winslow, 95-24. SEC. 4. That this State shall ever remain a member of the American Union; that the people thereof are part of the American Nation; that there is no right on the part of the State to secede, and that all attempts, from whatever source or upon whatever pretext, to dissolve said Union, or to sever said Nation, ought to be resisted with the whole power of the State. Const. 1868. SEC. 5. That every citizen of this State owes paramount allegiance to the Constitution and government of the United States, and that no law or ordinance of the State in contravention or subversion thereof can have any binding force. Const. 1868. SEC. 6. The State shall never assume or pay, or authorize the collection of any debt or obligation, express or implied, incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; nor shall the General Assembly assume or pay, or authorize the collection of any tax to pay, either directly or indirectly, expressed or implied, any debt or bond incurred, or issued, by authority of the Convention of the year one thousand eight hundred and sixty-eight, nor any debt or bond incurred or issued by the Legislature of the year one thousand eight hundred and sixty-eight, either at its special session of the year one thousand eight hundred and sixty-eight, or at its regular sessions of the years one thousand eight hundred and sixty-eight and one thousand eight hundred and sixty-nine, and one thousand eight hundred and sixty-nine and one thousand eight hundred and seventy, except the bonds issued to fund the interest on the old debt of the State, unless the proposing to pay the same shall have been submitted to the people and by them ratified by the vote of a majority of all the qualified voters of the State, at a regular election held for that purpose. Const. 1868; 1872-3, c. 85; 1879, с. 268. Const. 1, s. 6-Annot. Comrs. v. Snuggs, 121-409; Baltzer v. State, 104-265; Horne v. State, 84-362; Brickell v. Comrs., 81-240; Davis v. Comrs., 72-441; Lance v. Hunter, 72-178; Logan v. Plummer, 70-388; Rand v. State, 65-197; R. R. v. Holden, 63-414; Galloway v. Jenkins, 63-152. Const. 1, s. 7. SEC. 7. No man or set of men are entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges from the community but in consideration of public services. Const. 1868; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 3. Power Co. v. Power Co., 175-668, 171-248; Reid v. R. R., 162-355; State v. Perry, 151-661; St. George v. Hardie, 147-88; State v. Cantwell, 142604; In re Spease Ferry, 138-219; Bray v. Williams, 137-391; Mial v. Ellington, 134-131; Ewbank v. Turner, 134-82; State v. Biggs, 133-729; Jones v. Comrs., 130-451; Hancock v. R. R., 124-255; Motley v. Warehouse Co., 122-350, 124-232; State v. Call, 121-645; Broadfoot v. Fayetteville, 121-418; Rowland v. Loan Assn., 116-879; R. R. Comrs. v. Tel. Co., 113213; State v. Van Doran, 109-864; State v. Stovall, 103-416; Gregory v. Forbes, 96-77; Bridge Co. v. Comrs., 81-491; State v. Morris, 77-512; Simonton v. Lanier, 71-503; Barrington v. Ferry Co., 69-165; Kingsbury v. R. R., 66-284; Long v. Beard, 7-57; Bank v. Taylor, 6-266. executive and SEC. 8. The legislative, executive and supreme judicial powers The legislative, of the government ought to be forever separate and distinct from judicial powers each other. Const. 1868; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 4. Lee v. Beard, 146-361; State v. Turner, 143-641; White v. Auditor, 126605; Bird v. Gilliam, 125-79; Wilson v. Jordan, 124-705; Miller v. Alexander, 122-718; Garner v. Worth, 122-257; Caldwell v. Wilson, 121476; Carr v. Coke, 116-236; Goodwin v. Fertilizer Works, 119-120; In re Sultan, 115-62; Herndon v. Ins. Co., 111-386; Horton v. Green, 104-401; Rencher v. Anderson, 93-105; Burton v. Spiers, 92-503; In re Oldham, 8923; Brown v. Turner, 70-93; Railroad v. Jenkins, 68-503; Barnes v. Barnes, 53-372; Houston v. Bogle, 32-504; Hoke v. Henderson, 15-1; Robinson v. Barfield, 6-391. distinct. suspending laws. SEC. 9. All power of suspending laws, or the execution of laws, Of the power of by any authority, without the consent of the representatives of the people, is injurious to their rights, and ought not to be exercised. Const. 1868; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 5. Jones v. Comrs., 130-470; Abbott v. Beddingfield, 125-268 (dissenting opinion); White v. Auditor, 126-605. SEC. 10. All elections ought to be free. Elections free. SEC. 11. In all criminal prosecutions, every man has the right In criminal pros to be informed of the accusation against him and to confront the accusers and witnesses with other testimony, and to have counsel for his defense, and not be compelled to give evidence against himself, or to pay costs, jail fees, or necessary witness fees of the defense, unless found guilty. Const. 18683; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 7. State v. Neville, 175-731; State v. Fowler, 172-905; State v. Cherry, 154-624; State v. Dry, 152-813; State v. Whedbee, 152-770; State v. Leeper, 146-655; State v. Cline, 146-640; State v. Railway, 145-495; State v. Dowdy, 145-433; State v. Harris, 145-456; State v. Hodge, 142-683; State v. Cole, 132-1073; In re Briggs, 135-118; Sheek v. Sain, 127-266; State v. Mitchell, 119-785; Smith v. Smith, 116-386; Holt v. Warehouse Co., 116-488; State v. Shade, 115-759; State v. Massey, 104-880; State v. Cannady, 78-540; State v. Morris, 84-756; State v. Hodson, 74-153; State v. Collins, 70-247; State v. Alman, 64-366; State v. Thomas, 64-76; State v. Tilghman, 33-513. ecutions. criminal charges. SEC. 12. No person shall be put to answer any criminal charge Answers to except as hereinafter allowed, but by indictment, presentment or impeachment. Const. 1868; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 8. State v. Newell, 172-933; State v. Hyman, 164-411; State v. Harris, 145456; Ex parte McCown, 139-95; State v. Lytle, 138-742; State v. Hunter, 106-800; State v. Dunn, 95-699; State v. Powell, 86-642; State v. Moore, 104-750; State v. Cannady, 78-540; Kane v. Haywood, 66-31; State v. Simons, 68-379; State v. Moss, 47-68. Right of jury. SEC. 13. No person shall be convicted of any crime but by the unanimous verdict of a jury of good and lawful men in open court. The Legislature may, however, provide other means of trial for petty misdemeanors, with the right of appeal. Const. 18683; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 9. Excessive bail. Jones v. Brinkley, 174-23; State v. Newell, 172-933; State v. Hyman, 164-411; State v. Rogers, 162-656; State v. Brittain, 143-668; Ex parte McCown, 139-95; State v. Lytle, 138-742; State v. Thornton, 136-616; Hargett v. Bell, 134-396; Smith v. Paul, 133-683; State v. Ostwalt, 1181211; State v. Gadberry, 117-818; State v. Whitaker, 114-819; State v. Best, 111-646; State v. Cutshall, 110-543; State v. Hunter, 106-800; State v. Dunn, 95-698; State v. Powell, 97-417; State v. Divine, 98-781; State v. Powell, 86-6423; State v. Dudley, 83-661; State v. Cannady, 78-541; State v. Dixon, 75-275; Barnes v. Barnes, 53-366; State v. Moss, 47-68. SEC. 14. Excessive bail should not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel or unusual punishment inflicted. Const. 1868; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 10. See English Bill of Rights (1689), c. 1, s. 10. State v. Smith, 174-804; State v. Woodlief, 172-885; State v. Blake, 157608; State v. Lance, 149-551; State v. Farrington, 141-844; State v. Hanby, 126-1066; Bryan v. Patrick, 124-661; State v. Ballard, 122-1025; State v. Apple, 121-585; State v. Reid, 106-716; State v. Pettie, 80-369; State v. Cannady, 78-543; State v. Driver, 78-423; State v. Reid, 18-377. General warrants. SEC. 15. General warrants, whereby any officer or messenger may be commanded to search suspected places, without evidence of the act committed, or to seize any person or persons not named, whose offense is not particularly described and supported by evidence, are dangerous to liberty and ought not to be granted. Const. 1868; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 11. Imprisonment for debt. No person to be Brewer v. Wynne, 163-319; State v. Fowler, 172-905. SEC. 16. There shall be no imprisonment for debt in this State, except in cases of fraud. Const. 18683; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 39. State v. Williams, 150-802; Ledford v. Emerson, 143-527; State v. Morgan, 141-726; State v. Torrence, 127-550; Stewart v. Bryan, 121-49; Lockhart v. Bear, 117-301; Preiss v. Cohen, 117-59; Fertilizer Co. v. Grubbs, 114-471; Burgwyn v. Hall, 108-490; State v. Earnhardt, 107-789; State v. Norman, 110-489; Winslow v. Winslow, 95-24; Kiney v. Lougenour, 97-325; Long v. McLean, 88-3; State v. Beasley, 75-212; Melvin v. Melvin, 72-384; Daniel v. Owen, 72-3403; State v. Davis, 82-610; State v. Wallin, 89-578; State v. Cannady, 78-539; Pain v. Pain, 80-322; Moore v. Mullen, 77-327; Moore v. Green, 73-394; State v. Green, 71-173; State v. Palin, 63471; Bunting v. Wright, 61-295; Burton v. Dickens, 7-103. SEC. 17. No person ought to be taken, imprisoned, or disseized taken, etc., but by of his freehold, liberties or privileges, or outlawed or exiled, or in law of the land. any manner deprived of his life, liberty or property, but by the law of the land. Const. 1868; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 12; Mag. Carta (1215), c. 39, (1225), с. 29. Bradshaw v. Lumber Co., 179-501; State v. Kirkpatrick, 179-747; Parker v. Comrs., 178-92; Comrs. v. Boring, 175-105; Comrs. v. State Treasurer, 174-141; Lang v. Development Co., 169-662; State v. Collins, 169-323; State v. Bullock, 161-223; Dalton v. Brown, 159-175; Lawrence v. Hardy, 151-123; Starnes v. Mfg. Co., 147-556; Caldwell Land, etc., Co. v. Smith, 146-199; State v. Williams, 146-618; Dewey v. R. R., 142-392; Anderson v. Wilkins, 142-154; State v. Morgan, 141-726; Daniels v. Home, 139237; State v. Jones, 139-613; Cozard v. Hardware Co., 139-296; Porter v. Armstrong, 139-179; Ex parte McCown, 139-95; Mial v. Ellington, 134172; Lumber Co. v. Lumber Co., 135-742; Parish v. Cedar Co., 133-478; Jones v. Comrs., 130-461; Dyer v. Ellington, 126-941; State v. Hill, 1261139; Herring v. Pugh, 126-852; Hutton v. Webb, 124-479, 126-897; Southport v. Stanly, 125-464; Hogan v. Brown, 125-251; Morris v. House, 125-559; Day's Case, 124-362; Caldwell v. Wilson, 121-477; Wood v. Bellamy, 120-212; Hilliard v. Asheville, 118-845; Call v. Wilkesboro, 115337; State v. Warren, 113-683; Lance v. Harris, 112-480; Williams v. Johnson, 112-435; Bass v. Navigation Co., 111-439; Staton v. R. R., 111278; State v. Cutshall, 110-543; State v. Hunter, 106-800; Moose v. Carson, 104-431; London v. Headen, 76-72; Rhea v. Hampton, 101-53; State v. Wilson, 107-865; Woodard v. Blue, 103-109; Railroad v. Ely, 95-77; Winslow v. Winslow, 95-243; Worth v. Cox, 89-44; Whitehead v. Latham, 83-232; Vann v. Pipkin, 77-410; State v. Morris, 77-512; Whitehead v. R. R., 87-255; Bridge Co. v. Comrs., 81-491; Pool v. Trexler, 76-297; Privett v. Whitaker, 73-554; State v. Dixon, 75-275; Wilson v. Charlotte, 74-756; State v. Mooney, 74-100; Brown v. Turner, 70-93; King v. Hunter, 65-603; Bank v. Jenkins, 64-719; Norfleet v. Cromwell, 70-634; Johnston v. Rankin, 70-550; Franklin v. Vannoy, 66-151; Sedberry v. Comrs., 66486; Miller v. Gibbon, 63-635; Schenck ex parte, 65-353; Koonce v. Wallace, 52-194; Barnes v. Barnes, 53-372; Cotton v. Ellis, 52-545; Cornelius v. Glen, 52-512; State v. Glen, 52-321; Stanmire v. Taylor, 48207; State v. Matthews, 48-452; McNamara v. Kearns, 24-66; Houston v. Bogle, 32-496; State v. Allen, 24-183; Mills v. Williams, 33-558; State v. Johnson, 33-647; R. R. v. Davis, 19-451; Hoke v. Henderson, 15-1; Pipkin v. Wynne, 13-402; Hamilton v. Adams, 6-161; Oats v. Darden, 5-500; University v. Foy, 5-58, 3-310. See, also, section 19 of this article. SEC. 18. Every person restrained of his liberty is entitled to a Persons restrained of liberty. remedy to inquire into the lawfulness thereof, and to remove the same, if unlawful; and such remedy ought not to be denied or delayed. Const. 1868; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 13. Harkins v. Cathey, 119-663; State v. Herndon, 107-935; In re Schenck, 74-607. SEC. 19. In all controversies at law respecting property, the Controversies at law respecting ancient mode of trial by jury is one of the best securities of the property. rights of the people, and ought to remain sacred and inviolable. Const. 1868; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 14. In re Stone, 176-336; Crews v. Crews, 175-168; Walls v. Strickland, 174298; Silvey v. R. R., 172-110; State v. Rogers, 162-656; Williams v. R. R., 140-623; Kearns v. R. R., 139-482; Smith v. Paul, 133-66; Boutten v. R. R., 128-340; Caldwell v. Wilson, 121-465; Wilson v. Featherstone, 120447; Harkins v. Cathey, 119-662; State v. Mitchell, 119-786; Driller Co. v. Worth, 117-517; McQueen v. Bank, 111-515; Smith v. Hicks, 108-248; Lassiter v. Upchurch, 107-411; Railroad v. Parker, 105-246; Stevenson v. Felton, 99-58; Harris v. Shaffer, 92-30; Grant v. Hughes, 96-177; Pasour v. Lineberger, 90-159; Worthy v. Shields, 90-192; Wessel v. Rathjohn, 89377; Grant v. Reese, 82-72; Chasteen v. Martin, 81-51; Overby v. Association, 81-62; Bernheim v. Waring, 79-563; Atkinson v. Whitehead, 77418; Perry v. Tupper, 77-413; Womble v. Fraps, 77-198; Wilson v. Charlotte, 74-756; Armfield v. Brown, 73-81; Lippard v. Troutman, 72-551; Isler v. Murphy, 71-436; Witkowsky v. Wasson, 71-460; Pearson v. Caldwell, 70-291; Armfield v. Brown, 70-27; Green v. Castlebury, 70-20; Maxwell v. Maxwell, 70-267; Klutts v. McKenzie, 65-102; Andrews v. Pritchett, 66-387; White v. White, 15-257; Smith v. Campbell, 10-590; Bayard v. Singleton, 1-5. SEC. 20. The freedom of the press is one of the great bulwarks Freedom of the of liberty, and therefore ought never to be restrained, but every individual shall be held responsible for the abuse of the same. Const. 18683; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 15. Osborn v. Leach, 135-628; Cowan v. Fairbrother, 118-406. press. SEC. 21. The privileges of the writ of habeas corpus shall not Habeas corpus. be suspended. Const. 1868. Ex parte Moore, 64-802. SEC. 22. As political rights and privileges are not dependent Property qualifi upon, or modified by, property, therefore no property qualification ought to affect the right to vote or hold office. Const. 1868. Wilson v. Charlotte, 74-756. cation. Representation and taxation. Militia and the right to bear arms. Right of the people to assemble together. Religious liberty. Education. Elections should be frequent. Recurrence to fundamental principles. Hereditary emol uments, etc. Perpetuities, etc. SEC. 23. The people of the State ought not to be taxed, or made subject to the payment of any impost or duty, without the consent of themselves, or their representatives in General Assembly, freely given. Const. 1868; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 16. State v. Wheeler, 141-773; Winston v. Taylor, 99-210; Moore v. Fayetteville, 80-154; Worth v. Comrs., 60-617. SEC. 24. A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; and, as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up, and the military should be kept under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. Nothing herein contained shall justify the practice of carrying concealed weapons, or prevent the Legislature from enacting penal statutes against said practice. Const. 1868; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 17; Convention 1875. State v. Barrett, 138-637; State v. Boone, 132-1107; State v. Reams, 121-556; State v. Speller, 86-697. SEC. 25. The people have a right to assemble together to consult for their common good, to instruct their representatives, and to apply to the Legislature for redress of grievances. But secret political societies are dangerous to the liberties of a free people, and should not be tolerated. Const. 18683; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 18; Convention 1875. SEC. 26. All men have a natural and inalienable right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences, and no human authority should, in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience. Const. 1868; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 19. Rodman v. Robinson, 134-503; Lord v. Hardie, 82-241; Melvin v. Easley. 52-356. SEC. 27. The people have the right to the privilege of education, and it is the duty of the State to guard and maintain that right. Const. 1868. Collie v. Comrs., 145-170, overruling Barksdale v. Com-s., 93-483; Lowery v. School Trustees, 140-33; Bear v. Comrs., 124-212. SEC. 28. For redress of grievances, and for amending and strengthening the laws, elections should be often held. Const. 18683; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 20. SEC. 29. A frequent recurrence to fundamental principles is absolutely necessary to preserve the blessings of liberty. Const. 18683; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 21. SEC. 30. No hereditary emoluments, privileges or bonors ought to be granted or conferred in this State. Const. 18683; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 22. State v. Cantwell, 142-614; Bryan v. Patrick, 124-661: Bridge Co. v. Comrs., 81-504. SEC. 31. Perpetuities and monopolies are contrary to the genius of a free State, and ought not to be allowed. Const. 18683; Const. 1776, Decl. Rights, s. 23. |