A History of Political Theories from Luther to Montesquieu, Volume 2Macmillan, 1905 - 459 pages |
Contents
1 | |
2 | |
3 | |
4 | |
5 | |
6 | |
7 | |
26 | |
38 | |
39 | |
40 | |
47 | |
56 | |
61 | |
67 | |
76 | |
80 | |
81 | |
85 | |
87 | |
93 | |
96 | |
105 | |
108 | |
114 | |
120 | |
123 | |
169 | |
178 | |
187 | |
197 | |
205 | |
209 | |
212 | |
215 | |
219 | |
225 | |
305 | |
310 | |
319 | |
325 | |
331 | |
334 | |
335 | |
340 | |
345 | |
349 | |
354 | |
359 | |
363 | |
368 | |
369 | |
377 | |
384 | |
391 | |
392 | |
406 | |
418 | |
428 | |
435 | |
449 | |
452 | |
453 | |
454 | |
455 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
absolute absolute monarchy Althusius ancient aristocracy Aristotle authority basis Bodin Bossuet Calvin Calvinistic Catholic century chap character chief Christian church citizens civil common commonwealth conception consent constitution contract distinction divine right doctrine dogma duty ecclesiastical embodied England English especially ethics existence fact Filmer form of government function governmental Grotius Hobbes Hobbes's Huguenots Huldreich Zwingli human Ibid idea individual influence institutions iure ius gentium Johannes Althusius jurists justice king law of nations law of nature legislation Leviathan liberty Locke logical Louis XIV Luther Machiavelli magistrates medieval Melanchthon ment merely method monarch monarchomachs Montesquieu moral natural law natural rights obedience organization Parliament political philosophy political theory popular sovereignty practical prince principle Protestant Pufendorf reason Reformers relation religious Roman royal rule secular social society sovereign sovereignty Spinoza spirit Suarez supreme power tion Treatises tyranny tyrant whole
Popular passages
Page 261 - ... that nature should thus dissociate and render men apt to invade and destroy one another; and he may therefore, not trusting to this inference made from the passions, desire perhaps to have the same confirmed by experience.
Page 268 - I authorize and give up my right of governing myself, to this man, or to this assembly of men, on this condition, that thou give up thy right to him, and authorize all his actions in like manner.
Page 268 - A Commonwealth is said to be instituted when a multitude of men do agree, and covenant, every one with every one, that to whatsoever man, or assembly of men, shall be given by the major part the right to present the person of them all, that is to say, to be their representative...
Page 207 - that is no subject for the tongue of a lawyer, nor is it lawful to be disputed. It is atheism and blasphemy to dispute what God can do : good Christians content themselves with His will revealed in His word ; so it is presumption and high contempt in a subject to dispute what a king can do, or say that a king cannot do this or that ; but rest in that which is the king's will revealed in his law.
Page 256 - But whatsoever is the object of any man's appetite or desire, that is it which he for his part calleth good: and the object of his hate and aversion, evil; and of his contempt, vile and inconsiderable. For these words of good, evil, and contemptible, are ever used with relation to the person that useth them: there being nothing simply and absolutely so; nor any common rule of good and evil, to be taken from the nature of the objects themselves...
Page 326 - The Judgment and Decree of the University of Oxford past in their Convocation July 21, 1683, against certain Pernicious Books and Damnable Doctrines, destructive to the Sacred Persons of Princes, their State and Government, and of all Humane Society.
Page 151 - I saw prevailing throughout the Christian world a license in making war of which even barbarous nations would have been ashamed, recourse being had to arms for slight...
Page 345 - This therefore contains the power of war and peace, leagues and alliances, and all the transactions with all persons and communities without the commonwealth, and may be called federative if any one pleases.
Page 201 - ... strifes and troubles would be endless, except they gave their common consent all to be ordered by some whom they should agree upon: without which consent there were no reason that one man should take upon him to be lord or judge over another...
Page 269 - This is the generation of that great "leviathan," or, rather, to speak more reverently, of that "mortal god," to which we owe, under the "immortal God,