Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of California, Volume 31Bancroft-Whitney Company, 1917 Vols.106-140 includes section "Reports of cases determined in the appellate departments of the Superior court of the State of California." |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 95
Page vi
... Bank of Los Angeles , Youtz v .... 370 Fee v . McPhee Company . 295 Ferrara , People v ..... 1 Finali , People v .... 479 Fitzgerald , Pease v ..... 727 Fletcher Collection Agency v . Superior Court of Los Angeles County . 193 Forman v ...
... Bank of Los Angeles , Youtz v .... 370 Fee v . McPhee Company . 295 Ferrara , People v ..... 1 Finali , People v .... 479 Fitzgerald , Pease v ..... 727 Fletcher Collection Agency v . Superior Court of Los Angeles County . 193 Forman v ...
Page viii
... Bank of Bakersfield v . Williams .... 704 National Union Fire Insurance Company , Covey v . 579 Nevis , Waters v ....... 511 Newhall Land and Farming Company v . Burns . Neylan , Hammel v .. 549 21 Pacific Coast Casualty Company v ...
... Bank of Bakersfield v . Williams .... 704 National Union Fire Insurance Company , Covey v . 579 Nevis , Waters v ....... 511 Newhall Land and Farming Company v . Burns . Neylan , Hammel v .. 549 21 Pacific Coast Casualty Company v ...
Page ix
... Company v . Robert Dollar Company . 576 Sanderson , Hopkins v ..... 141 San Francisco Bridges Company , Earl v . 339 Saul , Matter of Application of ... 382 Savings Union Bank and Trust Company , Vragnizan v . TABLE OF CASES - VOL . 31 .
... Company v . Robert Dollar Company . 576 Sanderson , Hopkins v ..... 141 San Francisco Bridges Company , Earl v . 339 Saul , Matter of Application of ... 382 Savings Union Bank and Trust Company , Vragnizan v . TABLE OF CASES - VOL . 31 .
Page x
California. District Courts of Appeal. Savings Union Bank and Trust Company , Vragnizan v . Security Life Insurance Company of America v . Booms ... Sellers v . Solway Land Company ...... S. E. Slade Lumber Company v . Derby . Shaffner ...
California. District Courts of Appeal. Savings Union Bank and Trust Company , Vragnizan v . Security Life Insurance Company of America v . Booms ... Sellers v . Solway Land Company ...... S. E. Slade Lumber Company v . Derby . Shaffner ...
Page xi
... Bank and Trust Company . 709 Waldmann , Boscus v . 245 Warren , Grant v .. 453 Waters v . Nevis 511 Western National Bank v . Wittman .... 615 Wigley v . South San Joaquin Irrigation District ... 162 Williams , National Bank of ...
... Bank and Trust Company . 709 Waldmann , Boscus v . 245 Warren , Grant v .. 453 Waters v . Nevis 511 Western National Bank v . Wittman .... 615 Wigley v . South San Joaquin Irrigation District ... 162 Williams , National Bank of ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
adverse possession agreement alleged amount application attorney attorney at law bank building cause of action certificate Civil Procedure claim Code of Civil commission complaint concurred constitution contract corporation county of San court of appeal damages deed defendant defendant's district court eminent domain entitled error evidence execution facts fendant filed finding furnished instruction issue Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Kern County land lease lien Los Angeles County matter ment Mono County mortgage motion negligence notice opinion order denying owner Pacific Electric Railway paid parties payment person petitioner plaintiff possession premises proceedings promissory note proof prosecution purchase purpose question railroad reason received recover refused Respondent Southern Pacific Co statement statute sufficient Superior Court supreme court testified testimony therein thereof thousand dollars tiff tion trial court verdict witness writ
Popular passages
Page 851 - An intervention takes place when a third person is permitted to become a party to an action or proceeding between other persons, either by joining the plaintiff in claiming what is sought by the complaint, or by uniting with the defendant in resisting the claims of the plaintiff, or by demanding anything...
Page 581 - This policy is made and accepted subject to the foregoing stipulations and conditions, together with such other provisions, agreements, or conditions as may be endorsed hereon or added hereto, and no officer, agent, or other representative of this company shall have power to waive any provision or condition of this policy except such as by the terms of this policy may be the subject...
Page 81 - If the judgment or order appealed from direct the sale or delivery of possession of real property, the execution of the same shall not be stayed, unless a written undertaking be executed on the part of the appellant, with two or more sureties, to the effect...
Page 523 - ... to establish a defence on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.
Page 124 - The positive assertion, in a manner not warranted by the information of the person making it, of that which is not true, though he believes it to be true; 3.
Page 197 - ... shall be punished by imprisonment In the state prison for not less than one year and not more than five years.
Page 123 - The defendants appeal from the judgment, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial. The plaintiffs own lands through which the Santa Ana river flows.
Page 363 - Every clerk, agent, or servant of any person who fraudulently appropriates to his own use, or secretes with a fraudulent intent to appropriate to his own use, any property of another which has come into his control or care by virtue of his employment as such clerk, agent, or servant, is guilty of embezzlement.
Page 510 - The homestead of a married person cannot be conveyed or encumbered unless the instrument by which it is conveyed or encumbered is executed and acknowledged by both husband and wife.
Page 607 - The question always is: Was there an unbroken connection between the wrongful act and the injury, a continuous operation? Did the facts constitute a continuous succession of events, so linked together as to make a natural whole, or was there sottfe new and Independent cause intervening between the wrong and the injury?