The Law of the Heart: Individualism and the Modern Self in American LiteratureUniversity of Texas Press, 1979 - 180 pages The Law of the Heart is a vigorous challenge to the prevailing concept of the "antidemocratic" image of the self in the American literary and cultural tradition. Sam B. Girgus counters this interpretation and attempts to develop a new understanding of democratic individualism and liberal humanism in American literature under the rubric of literary modernism. The image of the individual self who retreats inward, conforming to a distorted "law of the heart," emerges from the works of such writers as Cooper and Poe and composer Charles Ives. Yet, as Girgus shows, other American writers relate the idea of the self to reality and culture in a more complex way: the self confronts and is reconciled to the paradox of history and reality. In Girgus' view, the tradition of pragmatic, humanistic individualism provides a foundation for a future where individual liberty is a major priority. He uses literary modernism as a bridge for relating contemporary social conditions to crises of the American self and culture as seen in the works of writers including Emerson, Howells, Whitman, Henry James, William James, Fitzgerald, Bellow, and McLuhan. |
Contents
Poe and the Transcendent Self | 24 |
The Scholar the Self | 37 |
Culture and Self | 52 |
Copyright | |
6 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
according achieve action American appears argues attempt Bartley basic becomes believes Brownson calls century character complex concept concern consciousness continues course create creative critics culture death democracy democratic describes discussion Diver Emerson equality Essays existence existential experience fact false fear feel Fitzgerald forces freedom further heart Henry Howells human idea ideal imagination important included indicates individual inner interest involved Ives James kind Laing liberal liberty literary literature living Maisie major mass means mind modern moral myth nature needs never notes novel origins perversion political position possible present question radical reality relates relationship represents responsibility says scholar seems sense situation social society story symbol things thought tion tradition Trilling true truth turn understanding University University Press values Whitman whole writes York