Page images
PDF
EPUB

Α

INDEX OF CASES

V.

Albany Heights Realty Co.
Vogt, 182 App. Div. 736; 169
N. Y. Supp. 1049 (1918), 286
Albany St., Matter of, 11 Wendell
(N. Y.) 149 (1834), 70, 133
Allison v. Welde, 172 N. Y. 421
(1902), 565

Altschul v. Ludwig, 216 N. Y. 459
(1916), 574

American Assoc. v. Commonwealth,
193 Mass. 470 (1907), 371
Anderson v. Steinway, 178 App.
Div. 507; 221 N. Y. 639 (1917),
286

Appeal of Rees, 8 Sadler (Penn.)
582 (1888), 391

Application of Senate, 10 Minn. 78
(1865), 135

Attorney General v. Williams, 174
Mass. 476 (1899), 137, 385
Attorney General v. Williams, 178
Mass. 330 (1901), 385

B

Bacon v. Walker, 204 U. S. 311
(1907), 285

Baltimore, Mayor, etc. of, v. Clunet,
etc. 23 Md. 449 (1865), 68
Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U. S. 27
(1884), 285, 286

Bauman v. Ross, 167 U. S. 548
(1897), 32

Bell v. Town of Westfield (N. J.)
pending in Supr. Ct., 566
Bellows v. City Council of Cincin-
nati, 11 Ohio St. Rep. 544 (1860),
564

Bennett v. Boyle, 40 Barbour (N.
Y.) 551 (1863), 133

Birdsall v. Clark, 73 N. Y. 73, 573
Blakeslee v. Mayor and Aldermen

of Jersey City, 95 N. J. Law Rep.
284; 112 Atl. 593 (1921), 285, 286
Bond v. Mayor and City of Balti-

more, 116 Md. 683 (1911), 135

Bonnett v. Vallier, 136 Wis. 193

(1908), 287
Bostock v.
(1902), 287

Sams, 95 Md. 400

Boston, etc., Corp. v. Newman, 12
Pickering (Mass.) 467 (1832),
382

Boulat v. Municipality No. 1, 5 La.
Ann. Rep. 363 (1850), 68
Bowman v. R. Co., 125 U. S. 465
(1888), 539

Boyd v. City of Sierra Madre, 41
Cal. App. 520; 183 Pac. 230
(1919), 285

Brenner, Matter of, 170 N. Y. 186
(1902), 565

Brooklyn v. Copeland, 106 N. Y.
496 (1887), 57

Brooklyn Park Commissioners v.
Armstrong, 45 N. Y. 234 (1871),

57

Brown v. City of Los Angeles, 183
Cal. 783; 192 Pac. 716 (1920),
284, 285, 287

Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheaton
(U. S.) 419 (1827), 18, 22
Browne v. Boston, 179 Mass. 321
(1901), 362

Buchanan v. Warley, 165 Ky. 559;
reversed 245 U. S. 60 (1917), 287
Bulger, In re, 45 Cal. 533 (1873),
564

Bunyan v. Commissioners of Pali-
sades Interstate Park, 153 N. Y.
Supp. 622 (1915), 389
Burnham v. Milwaukee, 98 Wis.
(1897), 362

Butler v. White, 83 Fed. Rep. 578
(1897), 565

Byrne v. Md. Realty Co., 129 Md.
202; 98 Atl. 547 (1916), 284

C

Calvo v. City of New Orleans, 136
La. 480; 67 So. 338 (1915), 285
Camfield v. United States, 167 U.
S. 518 (1897), 19

Carey v. City of Atlanta, 143 Ga.

192 (1915), 287
Cascade Town Co. v. Empire Water
& Power Co., 181 Fed Rep. 1011
(1910), 391

Central Irrigation District v. De
Lappe, 79 Cal. 351 (1889), 523
Chicago v. Gunning System, 214 Ill.
628 (1905) 266
Chicago v. Stratton, 162 Ill. 494; 44
N. E. 853 (1896), 266, 285
Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. Drain-
age Com'rs (Ill.), 200 U. S. 561
(1906), 287

Chiras v. Olinger, 50 Iowa 571
(1879), 286

Chittenden v. Wurster, 153 N. Y.
664 (1897), 565

Churchill v. Rafferty Collector, 14
Official Gazette (Philippines) 383
(1916), 392, 393

City of Chicago v. Stratton, 162 Ill.
494; 44 N. E. 853 (1896), 266
City of Des Moines v. Manhattan
Oil Co. 184 N. W. 823 (1921),
286, 287

City of Hammond v. Calumet C. &
S. Co. 262 Fed. 938 (1920), 286
City of New York, In re (Clinton
Avenue), 68 N. Y. Supp. 196; 57
App. Div. 166; aff'd 167 N. Y. 624
(1901), 388, 390

City of New York, Matter of
(Briggs Avenue), 118 App. Div.
(N. Y.) 224 (1907), 31

City of Olympia v. Mann, I Wash.
389 (1890), 286

City of Rochester v. West, 164 N.
Y. 510 (1900), 286

City of St. Louis v. Evraiff and

Friedman, Mo. Sup. Ct., Oct.
Term, 1921, 284, 292

City of St. Louis v. Russell, 116
Mo. 248; 22 S. W. 470 (1893),
266, 286

City of St. Paul v. Kessler, 146
Minn. 124; 178 N. W. 171 (1920),
286

City of Spokane v. Camp, 50 Wash.

554; 97 Pac. 770 (1908), 266, 286
Clark v. Nash, 198 U. S. 361
(1905), 21, 136

Cliffside Park Realty Co. V.
Borough of Cliffside Park, (N.
J.), 114 Atl. 797 (1921), 284, 286
Clinton Avenue, Matter of, 68 N.
Y. Supp. 196; 57 App. Div. 166;

aff'd 167 N. Y. 624 (1901), 388,

390
Cochran v. Preston, 108 Md. 220
(1908), 265, 284, 394
Commonwealth v. Boston Adv. Co.,
188 Mass. 348 (1905), 388
Cooley v. Port Wardens, 12 How-
ard (U. S.) 299 (1851), 538
Coon v. Bd. of Public Works, 7

Cal. App. 760 (1908), 266, 286
Covington, etc., Bridge Co. v. Ken-

tucky, 154 U. S. 204 (1894), 539
Coyne v. Prichard (Penn.), 116
Atl. 315 (1922), 286

Cuba v. Mississippi Oil Co., 150

Ala. 259, 43 So. 706 (1907), 286
Curran v. Louisville, 83 Ky. 628
(1886), 57

Curran Co. v. Denver, 47 Col. 221
(1910), 266

Curtis v. City of Los Angeles, 172
Cal. 230; 156 Pac. 462 (1916),
285
Cusack Co. v. City of Chicago 267
Ill. 344 (1915), 108 N. E. 340;
aff'd 242 U. S. 526 (1917), 24,
266, 285, 418

D

Dangel v. Williams, 11 Del. Ch. 213
(1916), 266, 285

Dartmouth College v. Woodward,
4 Wheaton (U. S.) 518 (1819),
163

Debt Limit, In re, 123 N. Y. Supp.
860 (1910), 362

De Lima v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 1
(1901), 536

Denver v. Rogers, 46 Col. 479
(1909), 266

Des Moines v. Manhattan Oil Co.
184 N. W. 823 (1921), 286, 287
Diamond Rings (The), 183 Ú. S.
176 (1901), 536

Dingley v. Boston, 100 Mass. 544
(1868), 140, 141

Dooley v. United States, 182 U. S.
222 (1901), 536.

Dorr v. United States, 195 U. S.
138 (1904), 536

Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U. S. 244
(1901), 536

Drainage District No. I v. Richard-
son County, 86 Neb. 355 (1910),
145
Dunn v. City Council of Charleston,
16 So. Car. Law Rep.-sometimes

[blocks in formation]

Bradley, 164 U. S. 112 (1896), 20,
21, 22, 144, 145
Farist Steel Co. v. Bridgeport, 60
Conn. 278 (1891), 382
Fletcher v. Peck, 6 Cranch (U. S.)
87 (1810), 141

Forbes Street, 70 Pa. St. 125
(1871), 31

Foster v. Park Commissioners, 133
Mass. 321 (1882), 386, 390
French v. Barber Asphalt Paving
Co., 181 U. S. 324 (1901), 377
Fruth V. Board of Affairs of
Charleston, 75 W. Va. 456; 84 S.
E. 105 (1915), 279, 286
Furman Street, Matter of, 17 Wend.
(N. Y.) 649 (1836), 31

G

Guinness v. Forchheimer, N. Y.

Law Journal, May 21, 1921; 190
N. Y. Supp. 929 (1921), 287
Gundling v. Chicago, 176 Ill. 340
(1898), 268

H

Hadacheck, Ex parte, 165 Cal. 416;

132 Pac. 584 (1913), 208, 285, 287
Hadacheck v. Sebastian, 239 U. S.
394 (1915), 208, 285, 287
Hagar v. Reclamation District, III
U. S. 701 (1884), 144

Hall v. House of St. Giles the
Cripple, 154 N. Y. Supp. 96
(1915), 280

Hammond v. Calumet C. &. S. Co.
262 Fed. 938 (1920), 286
Handy v. Village of South Orange,
(N. J.)—Atl.—(1922), 285, 287,
292
Hairston v. Danville and Western
Railway Co., 208 U. S. 598
(1908), 21, 24

Hawaii v. Mankichi, 190 U. S. 197
(1903), 536

Hays v. City of Poplar Bluff 263
Mo. 516 (1914), 266, 286
Head v. Amozkeag Manufacturing
Co., 113 U. S. 9 (1885), 145
Hellyer v. Prendergast, 176 App.
Div. 383 (1917), 565
Higginson v. Nahant, II Allen
(Mass.) 530 (1866), 387, 391
Home Ins. Co. v. New York, 134
U. S. 594 (1890), 376

Hopkins v. City of Richmond, 117
Va. 692 (1915), 287

Houck v. Little River Drainage
District, 239 U. S. 254 (1915),
147

Hubbard v. Taunton, 140 Mass. 467
(1886), 387

Huus v. N. Y. etc. S. S. Co., 182
U. S. 392 (1901), 536

I

Ingham v. Brooks et al., 95 Conn.
317 (1920), 279, 573

In re-Cases so reported are listed
under the principal word in the
title, in this index.

Interstate, etc., Railway Co. v. Com-
monwealth, 207 U. S. 79 (1907),
19

K

Kane v. Gaynor, Matter of, 144
App. Div. 196; 129 N. Y. Supp.
280; aff'd 202 N. Y. 615 (1911),
565

Kelly v. Minnesota, 63 Minn. 125
(1895), 362

Kentucky R. R. Tax cases, 115 U.
S. 321 (1885), 376

King v. MacPherson, 20 Dominion
Law Reports 988 (1914), 47
Kingman v. Brockton, 153 Mass.
255 (1891), 386

Knowlton v. Moore, 178 U. S. 41
(1900), 376, 378

L

Lake Shore, M. S. & S. Ry. Co. v.
Ohio, 173 U. S. 285 (1898), 287
Lewis Publishing Co. v. Morgan,
229 U. S. 288 (1913), 419
Lexington v. Lafayette Bank, 165
Mo. 671 (1901), 362
Lincoln v. St. Com'rs, 176 Mass.
210 (1900), 371

Lincoln Trust Co. v. Williams Bldg.
Corp., 183 App. Div. 225; 229 N.
Y. 313 (1920), 284, 288, 290, 570
Lowell v. Boston, III Mass. 454
(1873), 135

M

McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheaton
(U. S.) 316 (1819), 376
McMurtry v. Phillips Investment
Co., 103 Ky. 308; 45 S. W. 96
(1898), 284

Madera Irrigation District, In re,
92 Cal. 296 (1891), 23
Magoun v. Illinois, etc., Bank, 170
U. S. 283 (1898), 376
Matter of-Cases so reported are
listed under the principal word in
the title, in this index.
Mayor, etc., of Baltimore

V.

Clunet, etc., 23 Md. 449 (1865),
68

Meagher v. Kessler, 147 Minn. 182
(1920), 286

Merrill, In re, 45 Cal. 533 (1873),
564

Meyers v. Houghton, 137 Minn.
481; 163 N. W. 754 (1917), 286
Montgomery, In re, 163 Cal. 457;
125 Pac. 1070 (1912), 285
Moss v. Ruben Stern N. Y. Law
Journal, Dec. 29, 1921, 286
Myers v. Fortunato, (Del.) 110
Atl. 847 (1920), 266, 285

N

Nahser v. City of Chicago, 271 Ill.
288 (1916), 286

Neal v. Vansickle, 72 Neb. 105
(1904), 145

New York, City of, In re (Clinton
Avenue), 68 N. Y. Supp, 196; 57
App. Div. 166; aff'd 167 N. Y. 624
(1901), 388, 390

New York, Matter of City of
(Briggs Avenue), 118 App. Div.
(N. Y.) 224 (1907), 31

[merged small][ocr errors]

Ogden v. Saunders, 12 Wheaton
(U. S.) 213 (1827), 22
Olmstead v. Camp, 33 Conn. 532
(1866), 387

Olympia v. Mann, I Wash. 389
(1890), 286

O'Neill v. Leamer, 239 U. S. 244
(1915), 145, 147

Ontario Knitting Co. v. State, 205
N. Y. 409 (1912), 573
Opinions of Justices, 204 Mass. 607,
616 (1910), 129, 135, 138
Opinion of Justices, 234 Mass. 597;
127 N. E. 525 (1920), 284, 288
Oppenheim Apparel Corp. v. Cruise,
N. Y. Law Journal, March 2,
1922, p. 1914, 419

Orr v. Gilman, 183 U. S. 278 (1902),
376

Osborne v. Grauel, 136 Md. 88
(1920), 286

[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »