 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1912 - 800 pages
...be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for the purposes that are declared, by valid legislation,...appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in the control or use of his property for lawful purposes,... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1951 - 840 pages
...eminent domain, in the exercise of which property may not be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in the control or use of his property for lawful purposes,... | |
 | 1892 - 554 pages
...anthorities; but nevertheless we cannot forbear qnoting from the opinion in Mugler v. Kantns, supra: "A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...community cannot in any just sense be deemed a taking or appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in the... | |
 | 1888 - 1450 pages
...eminent domain, in the exercise of which property may not be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in the control or use of his property for lawful purposes,... | |
 | 1888 - 1462 pages
...eminent domain, in the exercise of which property may not be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...purposes that are declared, by valid legislation, to Ьеда injurious to the health, morals, or safety of the community, cannot, in any justg sense, be... | |
 | 1912 - 1170 pages
...court held that a prohibition elmply upon the use of property for purposes declared by the Legislature to be injurious to the health, morals, or safety of...appropriation of property for the public benefit" (123 US 668, 669, 8 Sup. Ct. 301, 31 L. Ed. 205), for the reason that the owner is not disturbed In... | |
 | Henry William Blair - 1887 - 770 pages
...eminent domain, in the exercise of which property may not be taken for public use without compensation. A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in the control or use of his property for lawful purposes,... | |
 | 1888 - 892 pages
...citizen uses his property for certain forbidden purposes which are injurious to the public interests. " A prohibition simply upon the use of property for...appropriation of property for the public benefit. Such legislation does not disturb the owner in the control or use of his property for lawful purposes,... | |
| |
A prohibition simply upon the use of property for purposes that are declared, by valid legislation, to be injurious to the health, morals, or safety of the community, cannot, in any just sense, be deemed a taking or an appropriation of property for the... 
