Now the jury have distinctly found, not only that there was no negligence in the construction or the maintenance of the reservoirs, but that the flood was so great that it could not reasonably have been anticipated, although if it had been anticipated,... The Theory and Principles of Tort Law - Page 64by Thomas A. Street - 1999 - 500 pagesLimited preview - About this book
| Great Britain. High Court of Justice. Exchequer Division - 1877 - 524 pages
...question is, did the defendant make out that the escape of the water was owing to the act of God ? Now the jury have distinctly found, not only that there...or the maintenance of the reservoirs, but that the 1876 flood was so great that it could not reasonably have been anticiNICHOLS pated, although, if it... | |
| William Henry Michael - 1877 - 936 pages
...damages, the j ury found that there was no negligence in the construction or maintenance of the pooh), and that the flood was so great that it could not reasonably have been anticipated, though, if it had been anticipated, the effect might have been prevented. Held by the Court of Appeal... | |
| 1877 - 558 pages
...damages, the jury found that there was no negligence in the maintenance or construction of the pools, and that the flood was so great that it could not reasonably have been anticipated, though if it had been anticipated tbe effect might have been prevented. Held (affirming the judgment... | |
| Nathaniel Cleveland Moak - 1878 - 918 pages
...question is, did the defendant make out that the escape of the water was owing to the act of God? Now the jury have distinctly found, not only that there...reservoirs, but that the *flood was so great that it [6 could not reasonably have been anticipated, although, if it had been anticipated, the effect might... | |
| William Wait - 1879 - 1002 pages
...is caused by the act of God, or vis major • as, for example, by an extraordinary rain-fall which could not reasonably have been anticipated, although,...anticipated, the effect might have been prevented. Thus, on the defendant's land were artificial pools, containing large quantities of water. These pools... | |
| Henry John Wastell Coulson, Urquhart Atwell Forbes - 1880 - 788 pages
...found that commou law. {here was no negligence in the maintenance and construction of the pools, and that the flood was so great that it could not reasonably have been anticipated, though if it had been anticipated, the effect might have been prevented; it was held, affirming the... | |
| Nathaniel Cleveland Moak - 1881 - 890 pages
...the recent case of Nichols v. Marsland^). He says, speaking of the flood which had occurred there, "The jury have distinctly found, not only that there...escape of the water was owing to the act of God." Pausing there, it may be observed, that to say that a tiling could not reasonably have been anticipated... | |
| Sydney Hastings - 1885 - 532 pages
...J., at p. 4. 8 A TREATISE ON TORTS. Chap. I. or ris major; eg, by an extraordinary rainfall, which could not reasonably have been anticipated, although...anticipated, the effect might have been prevented (s). The doctrine as The doctrine which is laid down in the text-books, that it is a to suspens,on... | |
| Thomas Edward Scrutton - 1886 - 382 pages
...the jury found that a flood was " so great that it could not reasonably have been anticipated, though if it had been anticipated the effect might have been prevented," and the Court of Appeal held that such a flood was an " act of God." The exception " act of God " appears... | |
| Thomas Edward Scrutton - 1886 - 386 pages
...been prevented." This view is supported by Nichols v. Marsland (x), in which the jury found that a flood was " so great that it could not reasonably have been anticipated, though if it had been anticipated the effect might have been prevented," and the Court of Appeal held... | |
| |