Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, Volume 18 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 51
Page 58
... removal , the State could , without regard to the existence of the wharf , authorize improvements in the harbor , by the construction of which the use of the wharf would necessarily be destroyed . 8. The statute of limitations of ...
... removal , the State could , without regard to the existence of the wharf , authorize improvements in the harbor , by the construction of which the use of the wharf would necessarily be destroyed . 8. The statute of limitations of ...
Page 59
... removal of obstructions to the har- bor , and generally to hold the property for the construction of wharves , landings , and other improvements intended for the safety and con- venience of shipping . Held : 1st . That the words in the ...
... removal of obstructions to the har- bor , and generally to hold the property for the construction of wharves , landings , and other improvements intended for the safety and con- venience of shipping . Held : 1st . That the words in the ...
Page 61
... removal of obstructions , and abatement of any and all nuisances on the water front mentioned in this act , and to prosecute the same to final judgment . " The third section proceeded : " SECTION 3. The commissioners shall have and hold ...
... removal of obstructions , and abatement of any and all nuisances on the water front mentioned in this act , and to prosecute the same to final judgment . " The third section proceeded : " SECTION 3. The commissioners shall have and hold ...
Page 67
... removal she could , without regard to the existence of the wharf , authorize improvements in the harbor , by the construction of which the use of the wharf would necessarily be destroyed . But it is contended by the complainant that he ...
... removal she could , without regard to the existence of the wharf , authorize improvements in the harbor , by the construction of which the use of the wharf would necessarily be destroyed . But it is contended by the complainant that he ...
Page 69
... removal of obstructions , and the abatement of nuisances on the water front , and to prosecute the suits to judgment ; and declared that the pos- session and control of the water front , with its improve- ments , rights , privileges ...
... removal of obstructions , and the abatement of nuisances on the water front , and to prosecute the suits to judgment ; and declared that the pos- session and control of the water front , with its improve- ments , rights , privileges ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
act of Congress action admiralty alleged amount appears Argument assigned authority bank bankrupt bill bonds capital stock cause Circuit Court citizen civil claim clause collector common law complainant Constitution construction contract controversy corporation courts of equity creditors debt decision declared decree defendant Delaware delivered the opinion District Court duty enacted equity evidence exemption fact filed Fort Leavenworth given grant habeas corpus held imposed interest issued judge judgment judicial Judiciary Act jurisdiction jury Justice land legislation legislature lien limited Lownsdale Maryland matter ment mortgage offence paid parties patent payment person plaintiff in error possession proceedings purchaser purpose question Railroad Company record rule sentence sold Stat Statement statute statute of limitations suit is brought Supreme Court taxation term Territory thereof tion transaction trial trustee Union Pacific Railroad United valid void Wallace writ of error
Popular passages
Page 453 - And the said records and judicial proceedings authenticated as aforesaid, shall have such faith and credit given to them in every court within the United States, as they have by law or usage in the courts of the state from whence the said records are or shall be taken.
Page 540 - that the laws of the several States, except where the Constitution, treaties, or statutes of the United States shall otherwise require or provide, shall be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in the courts of the United States, in cases where they apply.
Page 44 - If any one proposition could command the universal assent of mankind, we might expect it would be this, — that the government of the union, though limited in its powers, is supreme within its sphere of action.
Page 549 - That the Circuit Courts of the United States shall have original cognizance, concurrent with the courts of the several States, of all suits of a civil nature, at common law or in equity, where the matter in dispute exceeds, exclusive of interest and costs, the sum or value of two thousand dollars, and arising under the Constitution or laws of the United States...
Page 293 - ... exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under laws of impost, navigation, or trade, of the United States, where the seizures are made on waters which are navigable from the sea by vessels of ten or more tons' burden, within their respective districts, as well as upon the high seas...
Page 608 - But the rule of law is clear, that where one, by his words or conduct, wilfully causes another to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at the same time...
Page 4 - And the better to accomplish the object of this act, namely, to promote the public interest and welfare by the construction of said railroad and telegraph line, and keeping the same in working order, and to secure to the government at all times (but particularly in time of war) the use and benefits of the same for postal, military and other purposes, Congress may, at any time, having due regard for the rights of said companies named herein, add to, alter, amend, or repeal this act.
Page 314 - ... and each of the said district courts shall have and exercise the same jurisdiction, in all cases arising under the constitution and laws of the United States...
Page 178 - And that either of the justices of the Supreme Court, as well as judges of the District Courts, shall have power to grant writs of habeas corpus, for the purpose of an inquiry into the cause of commitment.
Page 45 - When they tax the chartered institutions of the states, they tax their constituents ; and these taxes must be uniform. But when a state taxes the operations of the government of the United States, it acts upon institutions created, not by their own constituents, but by people over whom they claim no control. It acts upon the measures of a government created by others, as well as themselves, for the benefit of others in common with themselves. The difference is that which always exists, and always...