...have been inserted by mistake. Cooper v. Farmers' Mut. Fire Ins Co. 50 Penn. St. 299. 1865. § 35. In an action upon a policy of insurance in which it...up as a defense that the insurable interest of the policy-holder was transferred to another by an absolute assignment in writing, after the issuance of...

...etc., "promise to pay," and signed C., "president," H. and D., " directors," and S., " secretary," it was held that parol evidence was admissible to show that the drawers of the note signed it as agents of the company, and not as individuals. In accordance with...

...CTH, " president," IN H. & IGD, "directors," and ERS, "secretary." In an action to recover on the note it was held that parol evidence was admissible to show that the drawers of the note signed it as agents of the company and not as individuals. This case seems to be...

...by letter which did not mention any time for payment, the plaintiff sent the goods and an invoice. It was held that parol evidence was admissible to show that the goods were supplied on credit, the letter not amounting to a valid contract within the Statute of Frauds....

...wassignedby four individuals, adding, " President and Directors of the Prospect Stockton Cheese Company." It was held that parol evidence was admissible to show that the note was the obligation of the company. Rendell v. Harriman, 75 Me. 497. Where a note by which "the...

...— On a prosecution for passing a counterfeit bill, in imitation of those issued by a certain bank, it was held that parol evidence was admissible to show that the person, whose name appeared on the bill as president of the bank, was in fact the president. CCTMULATTVX...

...parol proof. Thus, where the consideration in a deed conveying lands was expressed to be money paid, it was held that parol evidence was admissible to show that the consideration, instead of money, was iron of a specified quantity, valued at a stipulated price. It...

...369. In Crawford v. Morris, 5 Gratt, (Va.) 90, where there was a written agreement to renew a lease, it was held that parol evidence was admissible to show that the cellar of an adjoining tenement had been occupied with the premises to which the lease applied, and...

...last of whom he described us "Samuel G., son of Captain John F. Slaughter." There was no euch person. It was held that parol evidence was admissible to show that the testator meant Samuel G., son of Captain John F. Hawkins. Hawkins v. Garland, 76 Va. 149. Under a bequest...

...interest, for value received," and was signed by CTH, Pres., JNH & JGD, directors, and ERS secretary, it was held that parol evidence was admissible to show that the drawers of the note signed it as agents of the company and not as individuals, and that the note was...