...approved McNulta v. Lockridge. March 3, 1SS7, which provides by Sec. 3, tli.it "every receiver * * * of any property, appointed by any court of the United...the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver was appointed." We understand from the petition...

...Mass. 508; 15 Am. Rep. 63. But see a dictum contra, in Barton v. Barbour. 104 US 126, 128. 2 Every receiver or manager of any property appointed by any...of his in carrying on the business connected with stich property, without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed;...

...provides: " That every receiver or manager V" ^tiv property appointed by any court of the United States ^y be sued in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrving on the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which...

...court. Suits against re- SEC. 3. That every receiver or manager of any property appointed ceivers. ^y any COurt of the United States may be sued in respect...the business connected with 'such property, without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed; —subject to equi-...

...against receivers appointed by a federal court, without leave of the appointing court, is limited " in respect of any act or transaction of his in carrying on the business connected with such property." 25 St. 436, § 3- It does not include a demand arising prior to such appointment. The principle upon...

...U. 8. Act of 1887. — The act of March 3, 1887 (US Statutes, iS861887, 552), provides that "every receiver or manager of any property appointed by any...the business connected with such property without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed; but such suit shall...

...federal receivers are concerned, by the act of March 3, 1887, section 3, which declares: " That every receiver or manager of any property, appointed by...the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed; but such suit shall...

...(US Statutes, 18861887, 552), provides that "every receiver or manager of any property appointed bv any court of the United States may be sued in respect...the business connected with" such property without the previous leave of the court in which such receiver or manager was appointed; but such suit shall...

...resident agent of a non-resident receiver.17 A recent statute changes the practice as follows : " Every receiver or manager of any property appointed by any...United States may be sued in respect of any act or transac7 Kennedy v. IC & LR Co., 3 Fed. 11 Farmers's L. & Tr. Co. v. Centrnl R. 97; Union Trust Co....

...we are of the opinion that there is not. The act of March 3, 1887, declares that "every receiver . may be sued in respect of any act or transaction of...the business connected with such property, without the previous leave of the court in which said receiver or manager was appointed." We agree with the...