 The next contention is that the court erred in refusing to submit to the jury the question of probable cause for the arrest, and determined the issue itself as a matter of law.  Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - Page 246by Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Marquis B. Eaton, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1900Full view - About this book
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1898 - 732 pages
...seventy-live cents per square yard more than the price at which they took the contract in question. H eld, that the court erred in refusing to submit to the jury the question of "usual prices." />). 18. A contractor who has filed a mechanic's lien — he is entitled, for a... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1907 - 1074 pages
...for plaintiffs for the difference between the market price proven and twenty-seven cents. We think the court erred in refusing to submit to the jury the question of the salesman's authority to modify the contract; and if he had no such authority, whether plaintiffs... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1900 - 726 pages
...the ditches dug by the district without assuming the burdens imposed by the statute. It is next said that the court erred in refusing to submit to the jury the question whether or not said lands were benefited by such drainage through the ditches of the district. If the... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1895 - 730 pages
...sixth and seventh.— the court submitted, but not the other four, and the sec- , ond contention is that the court erred in refusing to submit to the jury the second, fourth, fifth and eighth of said questions. The second question was as follows: "If you have... | |
 | 1910 - 838 pages
...and an order of the court denying defendant's motion for a new trial. Appellant's chief contention is that the court erred in refusing to submit to the jury the question whether or not Dunnigan was an independent contractor, but, on the contrary, did instruct the jury... | |
 | 1911 - 608 pages
...any, of the company was. There was no negligence on the part of the company. The trial Judge was right in refusing to submit to the jury the question of whether there was an overcrowding which prevented the conductor from doing his duty, because there was nothing to... | |
 | South Dakota. Supreme Court - 1906 - 760 pages
...this ruling was assigned as error, and in disposing of it the Court of Appeals says: 'We also think that the court erred in refusing to submit to the jury the question made as to the credibility of the witness Ochninger. Although not contradicted, he was an interested... | |
 | Minnesota. Supreme Court - 1920 - 648 pages
...give in evidence a conversation had by him with Nelson immediately preceding the shooting. (2) Whether the court erred in refusing to submit to the jury the question of manslaughter in the first degree. (3) Whether there waa error in the exclusion of certain evidence... | |
 | 1902 - 1130 pages
...Ind. 304, 40 NE 527. It is assigned as causes for the granting of a new trial, separately as to each, that the court erred in refusing to submit to the Jury the 6th, 8th, 14th, 16th, 20th, 21st 22d, 23d, and 24th interrogatories submitted by the appellant The... | |
| |
